Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 15;13:1016. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01016

TABLE 2.

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) by pain pressure thresholds (PPTs) in knee OA.

Advanced OA group Early OA group Healthy volunteers
Parameter (N = 76) (N = 42) (N = 6
PPT_TK_Pa 392(225) 423(227) 690(192)∗∗
PPT_CK_Pa 427(327) 453(210) 628(62)
PPT_TK 366(214) 339(155) 454(115)
PPT_CK 376(179) 367(153) 452(99)
PPT_TK_M 345(183) 359(164) 1020(231)∗∗∗
PPT_R 381(186) 374(143) 500(63)

PPTs are shown as mean and standard deviation in parentheses in kPa. Significant differences with a Mann–Whitney U-test were: p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 between healthy controls and all OA subjects. There were no significant differences between advanced and early OA groups (p > 0.3). PPT, pain pressure threshold; PPT_TK_Pa, PPT for the target knee at the patella; PPT_CK_Pa, PPT at the contralateral patella; PPT_TK, PPT at for the whole knee; PPT_CK, PPT for the contralateral knee; PPT_TK_M, PPT for the target knee side at the malleolus; PPT_R, PPT at the right radius.