Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 15;10:2223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02223

TABLE 2.

Two-way analyses of variance of the study variables for the three groups.

Variable A Patients with AN (n = 41)
B Patients with depression (n = 20)
C Non-patient controls (n = 53)
F (2,108) P-value η2 Tukey–Kramer post hoc
M SD M SD M SD
EAT-26 49.16 14.73 16.03 15.33 9.91 8.81 115.14 p < 0.001 0.68 A > B∗∗∗,C∗∗∗
BDI 33.42 13.07 33.45 18.65 5.50 8.63 68.35 p < 0.001 0.56 C < A∗∗∗,B∗∗∗
General RF 3.53 1.53 3.71 1.56 4.69 1.30 7.49 p < 0.01 0.12 C > A∗∗,B
RME 24.57 3.95 24.56 5.33 24.98 3.13 0.14a p = 0.74 0.00
TAS-20 64.10 12.28 65.10 12.27 44.15 9.67 40.38b p < 0.001 0.43 C < A∗∗∗,B∗∗∗
TAS dif 25.23 5.86 25.92 5.84 16.31 5.21 32.7 p < 0.001 0.38 C < A∗∗∗,B∗∗∗
TAS ddf 18.26 4.87 18.78 4.61 11.34 4.00 31.03 p < 0.001 0.37 C < A∗∗∗,B∗∗∗
TAS eot 20.62 5.22 20.40 6.32 16.49 5.35 6.91 p = 0.02 0.11 C < A∗∗,B
ER 2.52 0.96 2.09 1.03 3.30 0.77 15.50 p < 0.001 0.21 C < A∗∗∗,B∗∗∗
EC 3.30 1.06 3.34 1.27 4.39 0.79 14.11 p < 0.001 0.20 C < A∗∗∗,B∗∗∗

p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. a = df (2,106); b = df (2,107). BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; RF, Reflective Function; RME, Reading the Mind in the Eyes; TAS-20, Toronto Alexithymia Scale; TAS dif, difficulty in identifying feelings; TAS ddf, difficulty in describing feelings; TAS eot, externally oriented thinking; ER, Differentiation of Self Inventory – emotional reactivity; EC, Differentiation of Self Inventory – emotional cutoff.