Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 15;13:370. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00370

TABLE 1.

Sociodemographic and screening outcomes of the current sample (N = 36).

Group
HFR LFR
Variable (n = 19) (n = 17) t/χ2/U p ESE
Age (years) 21.37 (1.64) 24.18 (5.68) 104.00 0.07 0.30
Sex 0.423 0.516 0.11
Male 8 9
Female 11 8
HLOE (years) 12.63 (1.38) 13.35 (1.94) 134.50 0.40 0.14
Shipley 2 IQ Score 107.53 (13.16) 104.3 (12.5) 0.75 0.46 0.25
BDI-II 4.32 (2.57) 4.12 (3.73) 0.19 0.85 0.10
PSQI 3.47 (1.31) 3.59 (1.12) –0.28 0.78 −0.12
MAST 0.63 (0.68) 0.82 (1.24) –0.59 0.56 −0.19
Dream Recall Frequency 4.68 (1.19) 0.24 (0.03) 0.000 <0.001∗∗∗ 0.85
Recall Upon Awakeninga 7.59 0.006∗∗ 0.36
Yes 19 8
No 11 21

For all variables except Sex and Recall Upon Awakening means are presented with standard deviations in parentheses. Chi-square statistic was computed for Sex and Recall Upon Awakening, and Mann–Whitney U for Age, HLOE, and Dream Recall Frequency. HFR, High Frequency Recall Individuals, LFR, Low Frequency Recall Individuals, ESE, effect size estimate (for t, Cohen’s d; for χ2, Cramer’s V; for U, r); HLOE, Highest Level of Education Completed in Years; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition, PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, MAST, Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. Dream Recall Frequency relates to self-report of number of dream traces recalled per week; Recall Upon Awakening refers to whether a dream trace was recalled upon awakening in the sleep laboratory; athere were 13 out of 72 missing dream reports (following the adaptation night); ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.