Table 1.
First Author (year) Country | Study objective | Study design | Sample characteristics (age, sex) | Total sample size |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cressman (2013),18 Canada | To describe older patients’ and family caregivers’ experiences with delayed discharge | Qualitative interviews |
|
9 |
Kuluski (2017),19 Canada | To understand the experiences of family caregivers of patients experiencing a delayed discharge to a long‐term care facility | Qualitative interviews |
|
15 a |
Kydd (2008),23 United Kingdom | To describe frail, older patients’ lives after being classified as delayed discharge patients | Qualitative ethnography: interviews and observations |
|
14 b |
McCloskey (2015),24 Canada | To provide insight into the experiences of patients with delayed discharge and their family members | Qualitative interviews |
|
20 |
Patrick (2006),25 United States | To assess the effectiveness of a group intervention designed to encourage discharges for patients hesitant to be discharged | Mixed‐methods study evaluating a group intervention |
|
7 |
Swinkels (2009),26 United States | To assess older patients’ experiences with delayed discharge from an acute hospital setting | Qualitative interviews |
|
23 |
Wilson (2013),27 Canada | To understand older patients’ lived experiences as they waited in the hospital for discharge to a nursing home bed | Mixed methods: qualitative interviews, observations, photo‐voice; quantitative analysis of discharge data c |
Qualitative Phase:
|
9 |
Fifteen family caregivers were interviewed pertaining to twelve individual patients.
Fourteen delayed discharge patients included in the study; however, detailed descriptions were provided for three patients only.
Only the qualitative portions of this study are reported in this scoping review.