Table 2.

Connections between pairs of large-scale networks ‘nodes’ (first and second column) in which negative associations between conscientiousness scores and the “T”-index of dynamicity were found while accounting for the other personality traits as well as variability in sex, age, handedness, years of education, and intelligence scores (FDR: false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons across 105 connections).

ICA node#1	ICA node#2	P value (FDR)	Effect size	RRMSE
Extra-striate	Cingulate	0.012	0.154	0.167
Sensory/Motor-Limbic	Cingulate	0.012	0.157	0.188
Occipito-Frontal	Extra-striate	0.041	0.123	0.180
Occipito-Frontal	Fronto-Temporal	0.041	0.125	0.168
Default-Mode	Right-Fronto-Parietal	0.041	0.125	0.186
Default-Mode	Sensory/Motor-Limbic	0.041	0.122	0.185
Extra-striate	Anterior Frontal	0.041	0.131	0.154
Hippocampal-Cerebellar	Cingulate	0.041	0.130	0.189
Sensory-Motor	Sensory/Motor-Limbic	0.041	0.127	0.176
Occipito-Frontal	Striate	0.046	0.114	0.177
Occipito-Frontal	Sensory-Motor	0.046	0.118	0.145
Extra-striate	Occipito-Parietal	0.046	0.119	0.173
Extra-striate	Hippocampal-Cerebellar	0.046	0.114	0.175
Occipito-Parietal	Right-Fronto-Parietal	0.046	0.116	0.195
Occipito-Parietal	Sensory-Motor	0.046	0.114	0.149
Default-Mode	Striate	0.046	0.113	0.142
Fronto-Temporal	Sensory/Motor-Limbic	0.049	0.111	0.189

Effect sizes were estimated using partial correlations between the “T”-index and all independent variables in the model, ensuring full overlap between the estimated model coefficients and corresponding normalized effect sizes. Relative root mean square error (RRMSE) resulting from employing the estimated models on the test set is also reported. Model accuracy is considered excellent when RRMSE < 0.1, good when 0.1 < RRMSE < 0.2, fair when 0.2 < RRMSE < 0.3, and poor if RRMSE > 0.3⁴¹.