Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 21;9:268. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0602-7

Table 2.

Overview of reviewed studies

Authors Year Sample size and study populations Task Results Performance bias free
(A) Overview of subclinical OCD studies
Ashbaugh & Radomsky32 2007 152 HC Repeated Checking Taska ↓ confidence high-checkers vs low-checkers
Ben Shachar et al.28 2013 47 HC; high and low OC tendencies General Knowledge Task  == confidence high vs low OC tendencies +
Coles, Radomsky & Horng33 2006

S1: 51 HC

S2: 81 HC

Repeated Checking Taska S1 & S2: ↓ confidence with repeated checking +
Cuttler et al.38 2013 199 HC Prospective Memory Task ↓ confidence undermined group +
Fowle & Boschen37 2011 60 HC Repeated Cleaning Taska no increase in confidence for repeatedly cleaned items, increase in confidence for non-repeatedly cleaned items +
Hauser et al.29 2017 40 HC; high and low OC tendencies Global Motion Detection Task ↓ metacognitive efficiency high compulsive group ++
Lazarov et al.26 2012 38 HC; high and low OC tendencies False Feedback Muscle Tension Task ↓ confidence high compulsive group +
Radomsky, Gilchrist & Dussault35 2006 55 HC Repeated Checking Taska ↓ confidence with repeated checking +
Radomsky & Alcolado34 2010 62 HC Repeated Mental Checking Taska ↓ confidence with repeated checking
Rouault et al.30 2018

S1: 498 HC

S2: 497 HC

Perceptual Decision-Making Task

S1: no relationship OCD symptoms and confidence

S2: no relationship OCD symptoms and confidence or metacognitive efficiency

AD symptom dimension ↓ confidence and ↑ metacognitive efficiency, CIT symptom dimension ↑ confidence and ↓ metacognitive efficiency

++
Van den Hout & Kindt31 2003a

S1: 39 HC

S2: 40 HC

Repeated Checking Taska S1 and S2: ↓ confidence with repeated checking +
Van den Hout & Kindt36 2003b 40 HC Repeated Checking Taska ↓ confidence with repeated checking +
Zhang et al.27 2017

S1: 30 HC

S2: 32 HC

False Feedback Muscle Tension Task S1 and S2: ↓ confidence high compulsive group +
(B) Overview of clinical OCD studies
Boschen & Vuksanovic53 2007 15 OCD, 40 HC Repeated Checking Taska

↓ confidence OCD vs HC

↓ confidence with repeated checking

+
Bucarelli & Purdon47 2016 30 OCD, 18 anxious controls Repeated Checking Taska  == confidence OCD vs anxious controls
Cougle, Salkovskis & Wahl40 2007

39 OCD checkers, 20 OCD non-checkers,

22 anxious controls, 69 HC

Memory Task ↓ confidence OCD vs HC and anxious controls
Dar et al.59 2000 20 OCD checkers, 29 PD, 23 HC General Knowledge Task ↓ confidence OCD vs HC +
Dar58 2004

S1: 20 OCD checkers, 20 PD, 20 HC

S2: 15 OCD checkers, 15 HC

S3: 6 OCD checkers, 6 HC

General Knowledge Task

S1, S2, and S3: ↓ confidence OCD vs both control groups

S1, S2, and S3: ↓ confidence with repeated checking

+
Foa et al.41 1997 15 OCD, 15 HC Memory Task ↓ confidence OCD vs HC +
Hermans et al.57 2008 16 OCD, 16 clinical controls, 16 HC Repeated Actions Taska ↓ confidence OCD vs both control groups
Karadag et al.42 2005 32 OCD, 31 HC Memory Task ↓ confidence OCD vs HC +
Lazarov et al.60 2014 20 OCD, 20 anxious controls, 20 HC False Feedback Muscle Tension Task ↓ confidence OCD vs HC and anxious controls +
Macdonald et al.43 1997 10 OCD checkers, 10 OCD non-checkers, 10 HC Memory Task ↓ confidence OCD checkers vs non-checkers and HC +
McNally & Kohlbeck39 1993 12 OCD checkers, 12 OCD non-checkers, 12 HC Reality Monitoring Task ↓ confidence OCD vs HC +
Moritz et al.48 2006 17 OCD checkers, 10 OCD non checkers, 51 HC Source Memory Task  == confidence OCD vs HC +
Moritz et al.54 2007 28 OCD, 28 HC Memory Taska ↓ confidence OCD vs HC under high responsibility +
Moritz et al.49 2009a 43 OCD, 46 HC Memory Task  == confidence OCD vs HC +
Moritz et al.51 2009b 32 OCD, 32 HC Memory Task  == confidence OCD vs HC +
Moritz et al.50 2011 30 OCD, 20 HC Memory Task  == confidence OCD vs HC +
Moritz & Jaeger44 2018 26 OCD, 21 HC Memory Task ↓ confidence OCD vs HC +
Radomsky, Rachman & Hammond55 2001 11 OCD Repeated Checking Taska ↓ confidence under high responsibility
Tekcan, Topçuoglu & Kaya52 2007 25 OCD checkers, 16 OCD non-checkers, 27 HC Memory Task  == confidence OCD vs HC +
Tolin et al.56 2001 14 OCD, 14 anxious controls, 14 HC Repeated Memory Taska ↓ confidence OCD vs both control groups with repetition +
Tuna, Tekcan & Topçuoglu46 2005 17 OCD, 16 subclinical checkers, 15 HC Memory Task ↓ confidence OCD vs HC
Vaghi et al.61 2017 24 OCD, 25 HC Predictive Inference Task  == confidence OCD vs HC
Zitterl et al.45 2001 27 OCD, 27 HC Memory Task ↓ confidence OCD vs HC
(C) Overview of subclinical schizophrenia studies
Koren et al.65 2017 61 help seeking adolescents Verbal Memory, Executive – and Social Functioning Tasks Positive relationship self-disturbance and meta-cognitive control +
Laws & Bhatt70 2005 105 HC Memory Task

↑ confidence in errors high delusion-proneness

↓ discrimination high delusion-proneness

Mckay, Langdon & Coltheart68 2006 58 HC Reasoning Task ↑ confidence high delusion-proneness
Moritz et al.71 2014 2008 HC Visual Perception Task

↑ confidence in errors high paranoia

↓ discrimination high paranoia

Moritz et al.73 2015 2321 HC General Knowledge Taska

↑ confidence in errors high paranoia, exaggerated with high competence or easy questions

↓ discrimination high paranoia, exaggerated with high competence or easy questions

Rouault et al.30 2018

S1: 498 HC

S2: 497 HC

Perceptual Decision-Making Task

S1: No relationship SCZ symptoms and confidence

S2: No relationship SCZ symptoms and confidence or metacognitive efficiency

AD symptom dimension ↓ confidence and ↑ metacognitive efficiency, CIT symptom dimension ↑ confidence and ↓ metacognitive efficiency

++
Scheyer et al.66 2014 78 help seeking adolescents Verbal memory, executive functioning and social functioning tasks  = = confidence high vs low psychosis-prone groups +
Warman69 2008 70 HC Decision-making task ↑ confidence high delusion-proneness
(D) Overview of clinical schizophrenia studies
Bacon et al.95 2001 19 SCZ, 19 HC General Knowledge Taskb

 = = confidence SCZ vs HC

↓ FOK ratings SCZ vs HC

Bacon & Izaute96 2009 21 SCZ, 21 HC Memory Taskb ↓ FOK ratings SCZ vs HC
Bhatt, Laws & McKenna74 2010 25 SCZ, 20 HC False-Memory Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Bruno et al.93 2012 28 SCZ, 14 HC Emotional and Non-Emotional WCST  = = discrimination SCZ vs HC, but ↓ metacognitive performance SCZ vs HC +
Davies et al.92 2018 41 FEP, 21 HC Perceptual Decision-Making Task ↓ meta-d’ FEP vs HC ++
Eifler et al.75 2015 32 SCZ, 25 HC False-memory Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Eisenacher et al.86 2015 34 at risk patients, 21 FEP, 38 HC Verbal Recognition Task

↑ confidence in errors at risk and FEP vs HC

↓ discrimination at risk and FPE vs HC

+
Gaweda, Moritz & Kokoszka76 2012 32 SCZ, 32 HC Source-Monitoring Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Gaweda et al.87 2018 36 at risk patients, 25 FEP, 33 HC Source-Monitoring Task

↑ confidence in errors UHR and FEP vs HC

↓ discrimination UHR and FEP vs HC

Kircher et al.77 2007 27 SCZ, 19 HC False-Memory Task ↑ confidence (more so in errors) SCZ vs HC +
Köther et al.88 2012 76 SCZ, 30 HC Emotion Recognition Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Moritz & Woodward78 2002 23 SCZ, 15 HC Source-Monitoring Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Moritz, Woodward & Ruff79 2003 30 SCZ, 21 HC Source-Monitoring Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Moritz et al.80 2004 20 SCZ, 20 HC False-Memory Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Moritz et al.81 2005 30 SCZ, 15 HC Source-Monitoring Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Moritz & Woodward84 2006 31 SCZ, 48 psychiatric controls, 61 HC Source-Monitoring Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs both control groups

↓ discrimination SCZ vs both control groups

+
Moritz, Woodward & Rodriguez-Raecke82 2006 35 SCZ, 34 HC False-Memory Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Moritz, Woodward & Chen85 2006 30 FEP, 15 HC Source-Monitoring Task

↑ confidence in errors FEP vs HC

↓ discrimination FEP vs HC

Moritz et al.83 2008 68 SCZ, 25 HC False Visual Memory Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

Moritz et al.89 2012 23 SCZ, 29 HC Emotion Perception Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

+
Moritz et al.91 2014 55 SCZ, 58 OCD, 45 HC Perceptual Decision-Making Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

+
Peters et al.94 2007 23 SCZ, 20 HC False-Memory Task

↑ confidence in errors HC vs SCZ

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

+
Peters et al.90 2013 27 SCZ, 24 HC Emotional Memory Task

↑ confidence in errors SCZ vs HC

↓ discrimination SCZ vs HC

(E) Overview of subclinical addiction studies
Goodie100 2005

S1: 200 HC

S2: 384 HC

General Knowledge Task S1 & S2: ↑ overconfidence problem and possible pathological gamblers
Lakey, Goodie & Campbell101 2007 221 HC

General Knowledge Task

& Iowa Gambling Task

↑ overconfidence problem and possible pathological gamblers
Rouault et al.30 2018 S2: 497 HC Perceptual Decision-Making Task

S2: No relationship alcoholism symptoms and confidence or metacognitive efficiency

AD symptom dimension ↓ confidence and ↑ metacognitive efficiency, CIT symptom dimension ↑ confidence and ↓ metacognitive efficiency

++
(F) Overview of clinical addiction studies
Brevers et al.102 2014 25 GD, 25 HC Grammar Task Disconnection confidence and accuracy GD
Le Berre et al.103 2010 28 AUD, 28 HC Memory Taskb ↑ FOK judgments AUD vs HC
Mintzer & Stitzer105 2002 18 MMP, 21 HC Memory Task

↑ confidence for errors MMP vs HC

↓ discrimination MMP vs HC

Moeller et al.104 2016 14 remitted CUD, 8 active CUD, 13 HC Perceptual Decision-Making Task ↓ metacognitive efficiency active CUD vs remitted CUD and HC ++
Sadeghi et al.106 2017 23 MMP, 24 HC Memory & Perceptual Task ↓ metacognitive efficiency MMP vs HC perceptual task, but not memory task ++
(G) Overview of subclinical depression/anxiety studies
Dunning & Story118 1991

S1: 164 HC

S2: 259 HC

Future Prediction Task S1 and S2: ↑ confidence depressed vs non-depressed
Quiles, Prouteau & Verdoux119 2015 50 HC WCST, Digit Span, Memory Task and Emotion Recognition Task No relationship confidence and depression/anxiety symptoms
Rouault et al.30 2018 S1: 498 HCS2: 497 HC Perceptual Decision-Making Task

S1: Negative relationship confidence levels and depression/anxiety symptoms

S2: Negative relationship confidence levels and anxiety symptoms, no relationship with metacognitive efficiency

AD symptom dimension ↓ confidence and ↑ metacognitive efficiency. CIT symptom dimension ↑ confidence and ↓ metacognitive efficiency

++
Soderstrom, Davalos & Vásquez117 2011 97 HC Memory Taskb ↓ calibration based on JOL mildly depressed vs HC = = calibration based on JOL moderate depressed vs HC
Stone, Dodrill & Johnson116 2001 200 HC General Knowledge Task ↓ confidence depressed group +
(H) Overview of clinical depression/anxiety studies
Bucarelli & Purdon47 2016 30 OCD, 18 ANX Repeated Checking Task  == confidence ODC vs ANX
Dar et al.59 2000 20 OCD checkers, 29 PD, 23 HC General Knowledge Task  == confidence PD vs OCD and HC +
Fieker et al.123 2016 45 MDD, 30 HC Emotional Perception Task Negative correlation confidence and depression severity +
Fu et al.121 2005 15 MDD, 15 recovered MDD patients, 22 HC Memory, General Knowledge, Perceptual and Social Judgment Task ↓ confidence MDD vs HC == confidence recovered MDD vs HC and MDD
Hancock, Moffoot & O’Carroll120 1996 14 MDD, 14 recovered MDD patients, 14 HC General Knowledge Task ↓ confidence for correct answers in MDD vs HC == confidence recovered MDD vs HC +
Lazarov et al.60 2014 20 OCD, 20 ANX, 20 HC False Feedback Muscle Tension Task ↓ confidence OCD vs ANX and HC +
Szu-Ting Fu et al.122 2012 23 MDD, 22 dysphoria patients, 32 HC Memory Task ↓ confidence MDD vs HC and dysphoria
Tolin et al.56 2001 14 OCD, 14 ANX, 14 HC Memory Task ↓ confidence ANX vs HC +

This table shows a summary of all studies assessing confidence in the different psychiatric disorders included in this review. In the various subparts, studies using the following populations are described: (A) subclinical OCD, (B) clinical OCD, (C) subclinical schizophrenia, (D) clinical schizophrenia, E) subclinical addiction, (F) clinical addiction, (G) subclinical depression/anxiety, and (H) clinical depression/anxiety. The results are schematically represented with ↓ signaling a significant decrease, ↑ significant increase and == no differences. Regarding the performance bias, the signs indicate the following: ++ : Study used bias free measures such as meta-d’ and/or actively kept performance equal between groups (e.g. by using a staircase procedure), +: The assessed groups had equal levels of performance, : Study did not use bias free measures and did not control for performance differences between groups, or did not report accuracy measures. For more information about the most frequently used tasks, see Table 1

HC healthy controls, OC obsessive-compulsive, OCD obsessive-compulsive disorder, AD anxious-depressive, CIT compulsive behavior and intrusive thought, PD panic disorder, SCZ schizophrenia, FEP first-episode psychosis, FOK feeling of knowing, GD gambling disorder, AUD alcohol use disorder, MMP methadone maintenance patients, CUD cocaine use disorder, ANX anxiety disorder, MDD major depressive disorder, S1 study 1, S2 study 2

aThis study has taken into account moderators (i.e. OCD-relevant contexts, responsibility level or subjective competence)

bThis study used a prospective confidence measure