Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 24;12(19):3110. doi: 10.3390/ma12193110

Table 5.

Advantages and disadvantages of the AM machines for production of metallic parts used by the studied companies.

AM System Advantages Disadvantages References
EOSINT M 280 Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS)
  • Moderate production rate

  • High accuracy and details (layer thickness 20–40 µm)

  • Fully dense parts after heat treatments

  • Good static mechanical properties

  • Finer grain size

  • Produces pars with medium surface roughness that improves biological performance

  • Requires heat treatments

  • Metals: AlSi10Mg, Cobalt-Chrome MP1, Cobalt-Chrome SP2, Maraging-Steel MS1, Nickel Alloy HX, Nickel Alloy IN625, Nickel Alloy IN718, Stainless Steel 17-4PH, Stainless Steel CX, Stainless Steel GP1, Stainless Steel 316L, Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-6Al-4V ELI, TiCP grade 2, and Tungsten W1

  • Low maintenance time

  • High energy consumption

  • Long building cycles

  • Need of building supports, which are difficult to remove

  • Grainy surface

  • Difficult part cleaning

  • Parts require heat treatment to release internal stresses

  • Needs high quality powder spec, only supplied by machine brand

[1,4,63,66,76,77,87,88]
Arcam Q10plus EBM
  • High production rates

  • Good accuracy (layer thickness 50–70 µm)

  • Easy nesting of parts

  • Produces pars with a high surface roughness that improves biological performance

  • Fully dense parts

  • Lower residual stresses than DMLS

  • Easy removal of support structures (manually)

  • No heat treatments required

  • Metals: cobalt chromium alloy (CrCo ASTM F75), Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-6Al-4V ELI, TiCP grade 2, and nickel alloy 718

  • Compliance with ASTMF136 standards

  • High maintenance time

  • High maintenance time

  • Only conductive materials

  • Rough surface

  • Needs high quality powder spec

  • Needs high quality powder spec, only supplied by machine brand

[77,80,87,89]
Company C in-house developed AM system
  • Ultra-fast production rate (mass production)

  • Cuts up to 80% in production costs compared to other AM systems

  • Low energy consumption

  • Machine cost is two orders of magnitude lower

  • Complies with metal injection molding standards

  • Metals: Stainless steel

  • Use of standard metal injection molding (MIM) powder material

  • Only one material is available

  • Parts require heat treatment