Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;2019(10):CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub5

Comparison 6. CO monitoring + contingency management versus smoking cessation support.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Long‐term abstinence (all randomised) 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Comparison: counselling, nicotine replacement therapy and monitoring only app 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Comparison: counselling and nicotine replacement therapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Long‐term abstinence (complete case) 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Comparison: counselling, nicotine replacement therapy and monitoring only app 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Comparison: counselling and nicotine replacement therapy 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]