Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 14;5:610–617. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.09.006

Table 2.

Comparing classification performance based on features used

Features used Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Accuracy
Vasculature features (F1 and F2) 0.74 ± 0.019 0.77 ± 0.006 0.49 ± 0.018 0.91 ± 0.007 0.76 ± 0.008
Texture measures (F3 to F8) 0.68 ± 0.022 0.76 ± 0.007 0.50 ± 0.019 0.87 ± 0.012 0.74 ± 0.010
Combined (7 PCs of F1 to F8) 0.82 ± 0.022 0.86 ± 0.011 0.73 ± 0.025 0.91 ± 0.011 0.85 ± 0.013

NOTE. Performance values were evaluated using different gold standards: cognitive tests (Cog.) and amyloid status (Aβ).

Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.