Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 29;15:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2019.08.006

Table 1.

Comparison of the Mutations in CTCs with Correspondent Primary Tumor Tissue in Single Genes in Different Subgroups

No. of Patients CTC+PTT+ CTC+PTT CTCPTT+ Concordance
Total 722 383 117 222 0.530

Disease

Melanoma 65 52 8 5 0.800
Lung cancer 276 205 27 44 0.743
Colorectal cancer 177 98 30 49 0.554
Breast cancer 204 28 52 124 0.137

Mutation

EGFR 93 70 5 18 0.753
BRAF 78 58 8 12 0.744
KRAS 347 227 52 68 0.654
PIK3CA 204 28 52 124 0.137

Country

China 192 155 15 22 0.807
The Netherlands 15 2 4 9 0.133
Greece 195 48 31 116 0.246
United States 55 33 9 13 0.60
Singapore 37 13 7 17 0.351
France 75 56 12 7 0.747
Italy 39 32 1 6 0.821
Germany 62 21 25 16 0.339
UK 28 10 9 9 0.357
Japan 7 6 1 0 0.857
Brazil 9 5 2 2 0.556
Spain 8 2 1 5 0.250

Method

Magnetically sensed antibody sandwich assays 4 4 0 0 1.000
Scorpion amplification refractory mutation system technology 20 19 0 1 0.950
Whole-genome amplification and Sanger sequencing 10 9 1 0 0.900
RELP-PCR 34 29 3 2 0.853
NGS 37 31 0 6 0.838
Membrane arrays 190 153 15 22 0.805
Immunohistochemistry 59 46 8 5 0.780
dd-PCR 16 10 4 2 0.625
The peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated PCR clamp with TaqMan-MGB allelic discrimination assays 13 5 2 6 0.385
PCR sequencing 157 51 52 54 0.325
Quantitative real-time PCR 14 3 5 6 0.214
Melting analysis 168 23 27 118 0.137

The concordance rate of mutations between CTCs and matched primary tumor was as follows: sum of patients with mutation existing in both CTCs and tumor tissue/sum of all patients. CTC, circulating tumor cell; dd-PCR, digital PCR; NGS, next-generation sequencing; PTT, primary tumor tissue; RELP-PCR, restriction fragment length polymorphism-PCR.