Table 1.
Principle | Reference |
---|---|
The type and scope of the economic or epidemiological evaluation should fit the requirements of the decision maker. | [20,21] |
Dynamic models should be used unless it can be demonstrated that herd effects are unimportant. | [[19], [20], [21]] |
Publications should include: results stratified by subgroup (e.g. age or sex), health outcomes in natural units, intermediate outcomes (e.g. pre-cancerous lesions) and sexual mixing assumptions. | [21,23] |
Goodness of fit to data should be shown where appropriate.a | [22,23] |
Sensitivity analysis (considering whether a probabilistic approach is appropriate) should be used and should include the discount rate. | [[20], [21], [22], [23]] |
All diseases that are relevant to the intervention should be incorporated. | [23] |
How the authors describe and document these aspects should be a decision they make. For example, some authors choose to develop online webpages which provide an enduring reference for subsequent publications. Another alternative is to utilise technical appendices and/or reference previous work as applicable.