Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;69(689):e827–e835. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706853

Table 1.

Summary of studies included in reviewa

Study, year of publication Participants n CXR positive, n (%) 95% CI for percentage Total CXR negative (%) CXR negative: normal (%) CXR negative: abnormal (%) Histology (%) Mean age, years Male,% Population characteristics Setting (primary or hospital) Country
Hamada et al,31 1999 31 22 (71.0) 52.0 to 89.9% 9 (29.0) NSCLC (74.2), SCLC (25.8) 60.6 100.0 Asbestos exposure Hospital Japan
Tanaka et al,32 1999 3 3 (100.0) 0 (0.0) NSCLC (33.3), pleomorphic (33.3), unknown (33.3) 72 100.0 Gingival metastasis Hospital Japan
Bini et al,33 2001 2 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Pulmonary blastoma (100) 62.5 100.0 Pulmonary blastoma Hospital Italy
Lee et al,34 2001 6 4 (66.7) 20.4 to 100% 2 (33.3) SCLC (100) 62.5 50.0 Paraneoplastic GI dysfunction Hospital US
Haro et al, 200235 208b 185b (88.9) 84.4 to 93.5% 23b (11.1) 62b 84.4b Haemoptysis Hospital Spain
Losa Gaspà et al,36 2002 93 84 (90.3) 84.0 to 96.6% 9 (9.7) 63.0 72.4b Metastatic cancer Hospital Spain
Abraham et al,37 2003 23 19 (82.6) 65.6 to 99.7% 4 (17.4) 53.4 47.8 Presented with facial pain Not known US
Gomez et al,38 2004 41 36 (87.8) 77.1 to 98.5% 5 (12.2) Carcinoid (100) 50.0 66 Bronchial carcinoid Hospital Spain
Kitazaki et al,39 2005 2 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0) NSCLC (100) 71.5 0.00 Bronchioalveolar treated with gefitinib Hospital Japan
Bando et al,40 2006c 15 12 (80.0) 57.3 to 100% 3 (20.0) SCLC (33.3), NSCLC (26.7), others (13.3), unknown (26.7) 68.3b 73.3 Vocal cord paralysis Hospital Japan
Bjerager et al,41 2006 58 46 (79.3) 67.6 to 91.0% 12 (20.7) 66d 64.3b Patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer in primary care Primary Denmark
Brock et al,42 2006 30 12 (40.0) 12.3 to 67.7% 18 (60.0) 9 (30.0) 9c (30.0) NSCLC (85.9), SCLC (8.7), other (5.4)b 46d 67.4b Patients with HIV Hospital US
Stapley et al,43 2006 164 126 (76.8) 64.5 to 84.2% 38 (23.2) 17 (10.4) 21 (12.8) NSCLC (64.0), SCLC (21.1), unspecified carcinoma (10.9), unknown (4.0)b,f 70.8a 68.8a Patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer in primary care Primary England
Fernandez et al,44 2007c 102 97 (95.1) 90.8 to 99.4% 5 (4.9) 5 (4.9) NSCLC (68.8), SCLC (20.5), anaplastic (9.9), unknown (1.8)b,f 68b 85.4b Patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer in hospital Hospital Spain
Kato et al,45 2010 3 3 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Squamous cell (100) 64.7 100.0 Squamous cell carcinoma with necrotic cavities Hospital Japan
Kikuchi et al,46 2010 2 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0) Pleomorphic carcinoma (100) 71.0 100.0 Pleomorphic carcinoma Hospital Japan
Uzun et al,47 2010c 51 50 (98.0) 94.2 to 100% 1 (1.9) NSCLC (90.2), SCLC (5.9), other (3.9) 54.3b 76.4b Haemoptysis Hospital Turkey
Mao et al,48 2011 10 6 (60.0) 39.2 to 99.2% 4 (40.0) NSCLC (70.0), SCLC (30.0) 58.7 50.0 Diabetes insipidus from pituitary metastases Hospital China
Okazaki et al,49 2012 2 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0) SCLC (100) 75.0 50.0 Gastric metastases from lung primary Hospital Japan
Barry et al,50 2015 158 126 (79.7) 72.7 to 86.8% 32 (20.2) 23g (14.6) 9 (5.7) Hospital Hospital Ireland
Ghimire et al,51 2016 7 7 (100.0) 0 (0.0) NSCLC (100) 54.7b 76.0b Patients undergoing bronchoscopy Hospital Nepal
a

Studies assessed as having low risk of bias are indicated in bold.

b

Number includes cases that were not eligible, which could not be excluded.

c

Interpretation of CXR reported as ‘abnormal’ or ‘normal’ but authors did not state which abnormalities were contemporaneously considered to be suspicious for lung cancer at time of reporting CXR. ‘Abnormal’ processed as ‘positive’ for this review.

d

Median.

e

‘Non-specific infiltrates’. Authors did not state if these were considered positive or negative.

f

Percentages are >100.0% due to rounding.

g

Abnormal but no follow-up recommended. CI = confidence interval. CXR = chest X-ray. GI = gastrointestinal. NSCLC = non-small-cell lung carcinoma. SCLC = small-cell lung carcinoma.