Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;6(4):1606–1614. doi: 10.1002/nop2.366

Table 3.

Mean and difference in overall HRQoL outcome (0–100 scale), the first and second measurement time

HRQoL outcome Gender Mean gender difference
Girl Boy
No. Mean (SD) No. Mean (SD) Crude (95% CI)a Adjusted (95% CI)b
KIDscreen
Vg1 Baseline 228 69.8 (11.5) 168 76.3 (10.7) 6.5 (3.78, 9.24)* 6.1 (3.69, 8.50)*
Vg3 Follow‐up 270 65.7 (13.3) 197 73.5 (12.4) 7.7 (5.18, 10.30)* 7.2 (4.82, 9.64)*
Change (95% CI)a   −3.8 (−5.49, −2.19)*   −2.6 (−4.55, −0.70)* 0.35c 0.39c
Self‐assessed health
Vg1 Baseline 228 2.67 (0.93) 167 3.20 (0.92) 0.52 (0.30, 0.73)* 0.52 (0.34, 0.71)*
Vg3 Follow‐up 268 2.62 (0.96) 196 3.05 (0.96) 0.43 (0.23, 0.63)* 0.45 (0.27, 0.64)*
Change (95% CI)a   −0.03 (−0.16, 0.09)   −0.12 (−0.26, 0.31) 0.41c 0.48c

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HRQoL, health‐related quality of life; SD standard deviation.

a

From a linear mixed‐effects model with a random intercept.

b

Adjusted for age and residential status; missing data for age (N = 10) and residential status (N = 173) was imputed using a multiple‐imputation technique.

c

P for interaction was obtained using a likelihood ratio test for time‐by‐gender interaction, that is to test whether change in outcome from Vg1 to Vg3 was different for boys and girls.

*

p < .001.