Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 26;33(8):e22959. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22959

Table 2.

Univariate survival analysis of OS and DFS in 113 patients with endometrial carcinoma

Variables n OS DFS
Mean ± SE (mo) 95% CI P a Mean ± SE (mo) 95% CI P a
Age (y)
<60 49 69 ± 2 65‐73 0.748 69 ± 2 64‐73 0.880
≥60 64 66 ± 2 63‐70 67 ± 1 64‐70
Histological cell type
Endometrioid 100 70 ± 1 67‐72 0.138 70 ± 1 67‐73 0.068
Nonendometrioid 13 62 ± 5 53‐72 63 ± 4 54‐71
FIGO stage
77 72 ± 1 69‐74 0.003 71 ± 1 69‐74 0.002
15 65 ± 4 57‐74 68 ± 2 64‐73
17 63 ± 4 54‐71 64 ± 4 56‐71
4 37 ± 15 8‐66 37 ± 15 8‐66
Histological grade
G1 43 72 ± 1 70‐74 0.459 73 ± 1 71‐75 0.291
G2 41 65 ± 2 60‐70 64 ± 3 58‐69
G3 29 62 ± 3 55‐69    
Lymph node metastasis
No 104 70 ± 1 68‐73 0.019 70 ± 1 68‐73 0.012
Yes 9 55 ± 8 38‐71 53 ± 9 35‐70
Depth of myometrial invasion
<50% 57 70 ± 1 68‐71 0.007 70 ± 1 69‐72 0.002
≥50% 56 65 ± 3 60‐70 65 ± 3 59‐70
HPIP
Low expression 54 73 ± 1 72‐75 0.002 73 ± 1 71‐75 0.002
High expression 59 63 ± 2 58‐68 61 ± 3 56‐67

Abbreviations: FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; G1, well differentiated; G2, moderately differentiated; G3, poorly differentiated; HPIP, hematopoietic pre‐B‐cell leukemia transcription factor‐interacting protein; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease‐free survival.

a

Log‐rank test.