Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;19:198. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0913-x

Table 7.

Weights size and FLOPs improvement by using our channel pruning scheme under different pruning ratios

Method Pruning Degree Weights (M) FLOP (M)
Our Before Pruning 3.77 2920.3
Pruning Ratio 0.5 1.76 1861.8
Pruning Ratio 0.6 1.4 1663.1
Pruning Ratio 0.7 1.06 1477.8
Pruning Ratio 0.8 0.74 1305
Pruning Ratio 0.9 0.43 1133.6
Pruning Ratio 0.95 0.29 1063.8
Work[11] N/A 0.55 47.4/188.5
Work[17] N/A 13.5 8521

The weights and FLOPs of work [11] and [17] are also included in the table. The work [11] has two types of networks with different input sizes: 32 ×32 and 64 ×64, and the corresponding FLOPs are 47.4 (M) and 188.5 (M), respectively