Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 22;33(8):e22975. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22975

Table 3.

Factors affecting CR by logistic regression model analysis

Parameters Logistic regression
P value OR 95% CI
Lower Higher
Univariate logistic regression
Age (≥60 y vs <60 y) 0.994 0.996 0.366 2.713
Gender (male vs female) 0.917 0.943 0.310 2.870
Relapsed vs de novo 0.847 1.123 0.345 3.649
Number of nodules (≥2 vs 1) 0.001 0.137 0.044 0.430
Largest nodule size (≥5 cm vs <5 cm) 0.033 0.325 0.115 0.913
Child‐Pugh stage (B vs A) 0.774 1.261 0.258 6.168
BCLC stage (B/C vs A) 0.005 0.215 0.074 0.628
Cycles of DEB‐TACE (≥2 vs 1) 0.782 1.156 0.416 3.210
AFP (≥98.8 μg/L vs <98.8 μg/L) 0.019 0.282 0.098 0.812
Multivariate logistic regression
Number of nodules (≥2 vs 1) 0.001 0.141 0.045 0.443

Data were presented as P value, OR (odds ratio), and 95% CI (confidence interval). Factors affecting CR were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression model analyses, and the multivariate logistic regression model analysis was performed using Forward Stepwise (Conditional) method. P value <0.05 was considered significant, and the significant results were shown in boldface.

Abbreviations: AFP, alpha‐fetoprotein; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; CR, complete response; DEB‐TACE, drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization.