Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 22;33(8):e22975. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22975

Table 5.

Cox's proportional hazards regression model analysis of factors affecting OS

Parameters Cox's regression
P value HR 95% CI  
Lower Higher
Univariate Cox's regression
Age (≥60 y vs <60 y) 0.187 0.498 0.177 1.403
Gender (male vs female) 0.220 2.542 0.573 11.272
Relapsed vs de novo 0.513 1.438 0.484 4.271
Number of nodules (≥2 vs 1) 0.057 7.164 0.942 54.510
Largest nodule size (≥5 cm vs <5 cm) 0.045 3.242 1.029 10.215
Child‐Pugh stage (B vs A) 0.030 3.623 1.130 11.618
BCLC stage (B/C vs A) 0.056 4.279 0.964 18.997
Cycles of DEB‐TACE (≥2 vs 1) 0.036 0.273 0.081 0.918
AFP (≥98.8 μg/L vs <98.8 μg/L) 0.266 1.862 0.622 5.569
Multivariate Cox's regression
Child‐Pugh stage (B vs A) 0.011 4.803 1.426 16.180
BCLC stage (B/C vs A) 0.044 4.752 1.044 21.621

Data were presented as P value, HR (hazards ratio), and 95% CI (confidence interval). Factors affecting OS were determined by univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazards regression model analyses, and the multivariate Cox's proportional hazards regression model analysis was performed using Forward Stepwise (Conditional LR) method. P value <0.05 was considered significant.

Abbreviations: AFP, alpha‐fetoprotein; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; DEB‐TACE, drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization; OS, overall survival.