Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;10:4801. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12794-2

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of the sensory switch circuit with the other switch circuits in vitro and in vivo. a Circuits performance in response to leaky expression of Gal4VP16 in vitro. Circuits were co-transfected along with varying amount of the CAG-driven Gal4VP16 (LK plasmid) as leaky expression into HEK293 cells. Each data point shows mean ± s.d. from three independent replicates, *P< 0.05, **P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001. b Schematic diagram of in vivo experimental design with xenografted HepG2 nude mouse model. c 1 × 109 VP of OV-Circuits were injected into xenografted tumor twice a week right after the size of tumor reached ~100 mm3. PBS was used as a negative control. The left panel shows the mouse weight after treatment. Each data point shows the mean ± s.d. weight (n = 10) at indicated day. The right panel shows the xenografted tumor size after treated. Each data point shows the mean ± s.d. tumor size (n = 10) at indicated day, *P< 0.05, **P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001,  Student’s t-test was performed. Source data are provided as a Source Data file