Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 23;2019(10):CD001417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001417.pub4

Faught 1996.

Methods Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study
 4 treatment arms: 1 placebo, 3 topiramate
 Pre‐randomisation baseline period: 12 weeks
 Treatment period: 16 weeks
Participants A multicentre study (USA)
 181 people were randomised (all with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy): 45 to placebo, 45 mg to 200 mg per day topiramate, 45 mg to 400 mg per day topiramate, 46 mg to 600 mg per day topiramate
 Age range: 19 to 68 years
Mean age: 36.9 years
 Other AEDs: 2 or fewer
70% males
 Median baseline monthly seizure frequency: 10.8 (10.0 for placebo group, 11.5 for 200 mg/d topiramate group, 11.0 for 400 mg/d topiramate group, 11.2 for 600 mg/d topiramate group)
Interventions 200 mg topiramate per day or 400 mg topiramate per day or 600 mg topiramate per day or placebo
Outcomes
  1. Percentage monthly seizure rate reduction

  2. Percentage responders (50%)

  3. Adverse effects

Notes Trial sponsored by Johnson & Johnson
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: random permuted blocks
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: sealed, numbered packages allocated sequentially
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: identical tablets and packaging
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: it is likely that blinding was maintained
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: specific details of outcome assessment blinding not provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: no concerns about missing data
Quote: "intention‐to‐treat efficacy analysis"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: protocol unavailable, but appears all expected and prespecified outcomes are reported
Other bias Low risk Comment: the study appears to be free of other sources of bias