Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 23;2019(10):CD001417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001417.pub4

Korean Topiramate Study Group 1999.

Methods Randomised, double ‐blind, placebo ‐controlled study
 2 treatment arms: 1 placebo, 1 topiramate
 Pre‐randomisation baseline period: 12 weeks
 Treatment period: 18 weeks
Participants A multicentre study (Korea)
 177 people were randomised (all with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy): 86 to placebo, 91 to topiramate
 Age range: 16 to 65 years
Mean age: 29.8 years for placebo group, 29.6 years for topiramate group
 54% males
Other AEDs: 2 or fewer
 Median baseline monthly seizure frequency: 5.6 for placebo group, 5.6 for topiramate group
Interventions 600 mg topiramate per day or placebo
Outcomes
  1. Median seizure frequency reduction rate

  2. Responder rate

  3. Seizure‐free rate

  4. Global evaluation by participant and physician

  5. Adverse effects

Notes Trial sponsored by Janssen Korea Ltd
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: random number tables with permuted blocks of 4
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: sealed, numbered packages allocated sequentially
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: identical tablets and packaging
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: it is likely that blinding was maintained
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: specific details of outcome assessment blinding not provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: 2 patients in the topiramate group and 1 in the placebo group were excluded from the analysis. It was determined that this did not represent a potentially clinically important impact
Quote: "intention‐to‐treat analysis (ITTA) was performed for efficacy and safety measures"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: protocol unavailable, but appears all expected and prespecified outcomes are reported
Other bias Low risk Comment: the study appears to be free of other sources of bias