Table A4.
Results of HR estimation, algorithm No. 2 (AR)—comparison of signal extraction methods.
| Video No. | RMSE [bpm] | sRate [%] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G | GRD | ExG | ICA | G | GRD | ExG | ICA | |
| video 1 | 9.5 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 6.3 | 45% | 62% | 74% | 55% |
| video 2 | 17.0 | 11.1 | 11.6 | 13.0 | 30% | 45% | 44% | 37% |
| video 3 | 15.6 | 15.3 | 12.2 | 5.0 | 48% | 45% | 61% | 68% |
| video 4 | 8.6 | 12.3 | 7.0 | 5.7 | 57% | 57% | 69% | 47% |
| video 5 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 80% | 83% | 82% | 77% |
| video 6 | 19.4 | 17.2 | 15.4 | 11.7 | 23% | 27% | 46% | 35% |
| video 7 | 5.4 | 7.9 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 76% | 73% | 71% | 48% |
| video 8 | 15.6 | 20.6 | 19.3 | 4.8 | 53% | 28% | 34% | 63% |
| video 9 | 23.3 | 35.3 | 35.5 | 30.0 | 10% | 13% | 12% | 9% |