Table A5.
Results of HR estimation, algorithm No. 3 (TIME)—comparison of signal extraction methods.
| Video No. | RMSE [bpm] | sRate [%] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G | GRD | ExG | ICA | G | GRD | ExG | ICA | |
| video 1 | 16.8 | 4.3 | 2.8 | 7.4 | 49% | 70% | 83% | 51% |
| video 2 | 21.3 | 11.3 | 10.9 | 12.2 | 38% | 47% | 53% | 30% |
| video 3 | 20.7 | 18.4 | 17.7 | 6.3 | 28% | 25% | 36% | 43% |
| video 4 | 14.2 | 13.1 | 10.4 | 8.6 | 35% | 43% | 45% | 21% |
| video 5 | 16.7 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 5.5 | 51% | 88% | 89% | 52% |
| video 6 | 20.0 | 21.4 | 17.8 | 12.2 | 22% | 21% | 22% | 26% |
| video 7 | 9.1 | 9.6 | 10.9 | 7.8 | 50% | 47% | 48% | 18% |
| video 8 | 21.4 | 20.9 | 21.2 | 9.7 | 14% | 18% | 20% | 23% |
| video 9 | 16.2 | 34.0 | 34.5 | 29.1 | 18% | 13% | 11% | 14% |