Table 3.
Values | Definition | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | Equal importance | Two criteria contribute equally to the objective in the immediately higher level |
3 | Weak importance of one over another | Experience and judgment slightly favor one criterion over another |
5 | Essential or strong importance | Experience and judgment strongly favor one criterion over another |
7 | Very strong or demonstrated importance | A criterion is favored very strongly; its dominance demonstrated in practice |
9 | Absolute importance | The evidence favoring one criterion over another is of the highest possible order of Affirmation |
2, 4, 6, 8, | Intermediate values between adjacent scale values | When compromise is needed |
Reciprocals of the the abovejudgments | If Criterion Ci has one of the above judgments compared to Criterion C j, then Cj has the reciprocal value when compared to Ci | A reasonable assumption |
Source:Saaty (1977).