Skip to main content
. 2014 May 5;29(3):226–234. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21755

Table 8.

The Predictive Bias and the 95% Confidence Intervals at the Medical Decision Points for two Evaluated Methods

Evaluated method 1 Evaluated method 2
Ion (mmol/l) Xrb (mmol/l) 95% CI of predictive biasa 95% CI of predictive biasa Acceptable bias (mmol/l)
K 3.6 −0.04 (−0.15–0.07) 0.10 (−0.04–0.24) ±0.13
5.2 −0.03 (−0.14–0.08) 0.14 (0.01–0.28) ±0.19
Na 136 0.43 (0.34–0.53) 1.11 (0.64–1.57) ±0.68
146 0.63 (0.54–0.73) 1.50 (1.03–1.96) ±0.73
Cl 99 −1.03 (−1.11–0.94) 0.13 (−0.25–0.51) ±0.89
110 −0.68 (−0.75–0.59) 0.12 (−0.26–0.49) ±0.99
a

Ninety‐five percent CI of predictive bias was listed in parentheses; the minimal requirements of biological variation for CV (7) were applied as acceptable bias (±3.6% for K, ±0.5% for Na, and ±0.9% for Cl).

b

Xr stands for reference limits.

Applying Olympus indirect ISE method as evaluated method 1, Johnson&Johnson direct ISE method as evaluated method 2, Roche indirect ISE method as the comparative method.