Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 13;30(6):1198–1207. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22003

Table 4.

Association of Both Cellular and Serum Levels of Cox‐2 with Clinicopathological Parameters of SCCs Patients

Clinicopathological parameters Cellular expression of Cox‐2 Serum level of Cox‐2
Cases N = 153 Cox‐2 Cyto +ve n (%) P value Cases N = 127 Cox‐2 level (ng/ml) Median values P value
+107 (69.9) −46 (30.0)
Age (median 55 years, 23–85 years)
≤50 35 30 (85.7) 05 (14.2) 0.512 34 15.76 0.352
>50 118 77 (65.2) 41 (34.7) 93 20.10
Menopausal status
Pre 29 21 (72.4) 08 (27.5) 0.700 18 19.23 0.488
Post 124 86 (69.3) 38 (30.6) 109 20.45
Gravida (median 4; 1–11)
<4 36 25 (69.4) 11 (30.5) 0.313 29 15.11 0.165
≥4 117 82 (70.0) 35 (29.9) 98 20.72
Parity (median 4; 1–9)
<4 78 53 (67.9) 25 (32.0) 0.265 63 19.23 0.836
≥4 75 54 (72.0) 21 (28.0) 64 19.74
Contraceptiona
Yes 21 11 (52.3) 96 (72.7) 0.400 16 15.84 0.527
No 132 10 (47.6) 36 (27.2) 111 20.19
Habitsb
Yes 40 12 (30.0) 28 (70.0) 0.744 28 21.92 0.181
No 113 95 (84.0) 18 (15.9) 99 19.00
Tumor size (cm)
≤4 68 31 (45.5) 37 (54.4) 0.002 51 11.79 0.0001
>4 85 76 (89.4) 09 (10.5) 76 23.91
Histopathological grade
G1 64 52 (81.2) 12 (18.7) 0.168 54 20.98 0.467
G2 44 29 (65.9) 15 (34.0) 36 19.23
G3 45 26 (57.7) 19 (42.2) 35 19.19
Lymphatic involvement
Yes 84 62 (73.8) 22 (26.1) 0.032 74 23.34 0.0001
No 69 45 (65.2) 24 (34.7) 53 13.44
FIGO stage
I + II 100 62 (62.0) 38 (38.0) 0.001 83 14.11 0.0001
III + IV 53 45 (84.9) 08 (15.0) 44 30.01

Chi‐square or Fisher exact test wherever applicable (for cellular expression of Cox‐2); Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis test wherever applicable (for serum level of Cox‐2); P ≤ 0.05 is considered as significant; bold values indicate statistically significant.

aContraception includes only the use of oral contraceptive pills.

bHabits include tobacco chewing, smoking, and/or alcohol consumption; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; G1, well differentiated; G2, moderately differentiated; G3, poorly differentiated.