Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 14;30(5):682–688. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21922

Table 2.

Results of Peripheral Hemogram Examinations in Different Work Types in the Case Group

Groups Number WBCs (×109/l) RBCs (×1012/l) Hb(g/L) PLTs (×109/l) LYMs (×109/l) MOs (×109/l)
Control 1,430 7.83 ± 2.62 4.53 ± 0.96 146.62 ± 29.31 267.19 ± 51.27 3.54 ± 0.91 0.62 ± 0.13
RDM 379 6.06 ± 1.08a 4.50 ± 0.93 144.86 ± 17.54 263.84 ± 46.19 3.22 ± 0.48a 0.61 ± 0.14
II 568 5.24 ± 0.91a, b 4.49 ± 1.04 144.49 ± 15.80 260.65 ± 43.50a 2.84 ± 0.51a, b 0.49 ± 0.16a, b
PL 203 5.02 ± 1.16a, b 4.49 ± 0.83 140.15 ± 20.72a 205.76 ± 40.53a, b, c 2.56 ± 0.50a, b, c 0.48 ± 0.17a, b
RIA RM 242 4.13 ± 0.85a, b, c, d 4.30 ± 0.68a, b 136.62 ± 14.67a, b, c 175.84 ± 37.61a, b, c, d 1.81 ± 0.32a, b, c, d 0.34 ± 0.10a, b, c, d
F 334.4 4.478 10.97 252.2 367.3 302.7
P <0.0001 0.0013 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
a

Compared with the control group, P < 0.05

b

Compared with RMD, P < 0.05

c

Compared with II, P < 0.05

d

Compared with PL, P < 0.05.

RDM, radiology diagnostic medical; II, industrial inspection; PL, petroleum logging; RIA RM, RIA radiotherapy medical.