Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 6;28(2):91–96. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21649

Table 1.

Results of Computer and Experimental BT2‐RFLP Analysis With FatI, Alw21I, HpyCH4V, and MwoI for Differentiation of Dermatophyte Strains Tested in This Study

Species BT2 GenBank accession number used for in silico analysis Total number of tested strains in this study Size of the BT2 amplicon (bp) BT2 profile after digestion with FatI (bp) BT2 profile after digestion with Alw21I (bp) BT2 profile after digestion with HpyCH4V (bp) Profile after digestion with MwoI Species identification by BT2‐RFLP/ sequencing
T. interdigitale JF731050–JF731054 55 790 2, 202, 246, 340 152, 217, 421 NA NA T. interdigitale
T. tonsurans JF731070–JF731074 9 790 2, 202, 246, 340 217, 573 NA NA T. tonsurans
T. rubrum JF731063–JF731067 28 796 2, 63, 125, 246, 360 NA NA 9, 97, 180, 510 T. rubrum
T. violaceum JF731088–JF731089 5 796 2, 63, 125, 246, 360 NA NA 9, 98, 689 T. violaceum
M. gypseum JF731096–JF731098 5 798 2, 124, 672 NA NA NA M. gypseum
M. canis JF731101–JF731103 10 770 2, 68, 111, 117, 226, 246 NA NA NA M. canis
T. schoenleinii JF731081–JF731082 2 798 2, 246, 550 NA 83, 118, 125, 219, 253 NA T. schoenleinii
E. floccosum JF731122–JF731123 24 789 2, 246, 541 NA 81, 219, 489 NA E. floccosum
T. verrucosum Undeposited data 2 798 124, 250, 424 NA NA NA T. verrucosum

NA, not applicable.