Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 9;26(6):441–446. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21544

Table 2.

Response and Toxicity Outcomes

Group 1a Group 2b
Selected variables rs11614913 n (%) n (%) P OR (95% CI)c
Response
CT+TT 51 (11.5) 240 (54.3) 1.00 (reference)
CC 23 (5.2) 101 (22.9) 0.66 0.88 (0.50–1.55)
Leukocytopenia
CT+TT 228 (51.6) 69 (15.6) 1.00 (reference)
CC 95 (21.5) 35 (7.9) 0.35 1.25 (0.78–2.02)
Neutropenia
CT+TT 235 (53.2) 41 (9.3) 1.00 (reference)
CC 102 (23.1) 24 (5.4) 0.18 1.48 (0.84–2.61)
Anemia
CT+TT 265 (60.0) 15 (3.4) 1.00 (reference)
CC 123 (27.8) 7 (1.6) 0.96 1.00 (0.39–2.57)
Thrombocytopenia
CT+TT 269 (60.9) 16 (3.6) 1.00 (reference)
CC 120 (27.2) 10 (2.3) 0.57 1.27 (0.55–2.92)
Hematologic toxicity
CT+TT 189 (42.8) 83 (18.8) 1.00 (reference)
CC 81 (18.3) 46 (10.4) 0.23 1.32 (0.84–2.01)
Gastrointestinal toxicity
CT+TT 262 (59.3) 16 (3.6) 1.00 (reference)
CC 111 (25.1) 11 (2.5) 0.21 1.72 (0.75–3.95)
Overall toxicity
CT+TT 176 (39.6) 88 (19.8) 1.00 (reference)
CC 63 (14.3) 54 (12.2) 0.02d 1.73 (1.10–2.71)
a

Group 1 for response means complete response or partial response, for toxicities means any grade 1 or 2 toxicities.

b

Group 2 for response means stable disease or progressive disease, for toxicities means any grade 3 or 4 toxicities.

c

Data were calculated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusting covariates for (i) response were age, gender, type of treatment regimen, tumor/node/metastasis (TNM) stage, performance status (PS), and histological type, (ii) anemia were PS, type of treatment regimen, and TNM stag, as TNM was a potential confounder for anemia, (iii) gastrointestinal toxicity were PS, gender, and type of treatment regimen, as gender was a potential confounder for gastrointestinal toxicity, (iv) other toxicities were PS and type of treatment regimen.

d

Data of statistical significance.

OR, odds ratios; CI, confidence intervals.