Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 4;27(1):5–11. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21554

Table 1.

Comparison of the Serum Fibrosis Direct Indices and the FibroTest Index in the Patient and Control Groups

Patient group
Inflammation grade (n = 108) Fibrosis stage (n = 108) Control group
Index n = 108 Mean G1 (n=16) G2 (n=21) G3 (n=51) G4 (n=20) S0 (n=12) S1 (n=18) S2 (n=21) S3 (n=20) S4 (n=37) n = 53 Mean
HA (ng/ml) 63.95a 40.55 35.77 76.63 104.68c 56.49 47.30 47.99 66.31 88.78 34.72b
CIV (ng/ml) 67.32a 40.66 35.49 74.25 144.35c 49.27 28.46 53.32 86.86 112.74 23.31b
LN (ng/ml) 78.39a 32.03 22.72 120.38 174.20c 30.89 21.22 75.86 130.27 154.84 30.67b
PIIINP (ng/ml) 9.26a 5.95 6.13 10.01 15.95c 9.77 4.88 9.86 8.73 12.36 3.90b
FibroTest index 0.41 −0.24 −0.27 0.34 1.74 −0.90 −0.24 0.23 0.62 1.15 −0.84
±1.55a ±1.84 ±1.26 ±1.20 ±1.53c ±1.06 ±1.39 ±1.28 ±1.29 ±1.63c ±1.15b
a

Comparison between the patient and control groups, P < 0.05.

b

In comparison to the G3, G4/S3, and S4 patients, P < 0.001.

c

The indices of the G4 patients were significantly higher than those of the G1 and G2 patients, and the FibroTest index of the S4 patients was significantly higher than those of the S1 and S2 patients, P < 0.01.

In the table, the HA, CIV, LN, and PIIINP values represent the geometric mean values, whereas the value of FibroTest index is the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation.