Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 27;28(4):281–286. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21681

Table 1.

Comparison of the URiSCAN Super Cassette ACR and the Quantitative Methoda

(A) Albumin (n = 1,040)
Quantitative method
mg/l 0 30 80 150
URiSCAN Super cassette ACR 0 437 60 2
30 46 79 34 5
80 2 15 28 52
150 3 6 271
Concordance Main diagonalb 78.4%
Main + first lateral diagonalc 98.8%
(B) Creatinine (n = 1,040)
Quantitative method
mg/dl 10 50 100 200 300
URiSCAN Super cassette ACR 10 17 15 1
50 7 200 47
100 97 316 39
200 1 78 125 14
300 3 40 40
Concordance Main diagonalb 67.1%
Main + first lateral diagonalc 99.5%
(C) ACR (n = 1,040)
Quantitative method
mg/g <30 30–300 >300
URiSCAN Super cassette ACR <30 501 60
30–300 49 160 58
>300 21 191
Concordance Main diagonalb 81.9%
a

Results falling into the main diagonal are bolded, and the results falling into the first diagonal are italicized.

b

Agreement between the URiSCAN Super cassette ACR and the quantitative method within the same categories.

c

Agreement between the URiSCAN Super cassette ACR and the quantitative method within ±1 categories.

ACR, albumin/creatinine ratio.