Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 10;41(1):946–953. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1655451

Table 4.

Associations between baseline TG and WC and renal outcomes after 3-year followup.

  Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
  OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m²      
 TG ≥1.7 mmol/l 2.44 (1.27,4.68) .007 2.01 (1.00,4.04) .05 1.71 (0.72,4.05) .221
 WC ≥90 cm (men) or ≥85 cm (women) 2.68 (1.25,5.75) .012 2.66 (1.08,6.58) .034 2.48 (0.98,6.31) .057
UACR ≥30 mg/g      
 TG ≥1.7 mmol/l 1.32 (0.56,3.11) .528 1.12 (0.78,1.60) .552 0.71 (0.23,2.26) .566
 WC ≥90 cm (men) or ≥85 cm (women) 2.43 (0.95,6.19) .063 1.59 (0.54,4.70) .406 1.37 (0.45,4.18) .579
eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m² and UACR ≥30 mg/g      
 TG ≥1.7 mmol/l 2.41 (1.28,4.56) .007 1.88 (0.95,3.72) .068 1.63 (0.69,3.81) .263
 WC ≥90 cm (men) or ≥85 cm (women) 2.89 (1.35,6.17) .006 2.53 (1.03,6.19) .042 2.35 (0.93,5.95) .07

Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex.

Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, TG, WC, BMI, SBP, DBP, FBG, TC.

Model 3: Adjusted for above + lipid-lowering treatment, blood-pressure-lowering treatment, antidiabetic treatment.