Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct;69(5):350–373. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-19-000001

Table 2.

Effects of CWF and bLAD lighting on food intake (g /100 g body weight daily), water intake (mL/100 g body weight daily), and animal growth rates (g/d) in C3H, C57BL/6, and BALB/c male and female mice during maintenance phase

C3H
C57BL/6
BALB/c
CWF
bLAD
CWF
bLAD
CWF
bLAD
M F M F M F M F M F M F
Food 19.88 ± 0.17 20.93 ± 0.13a 18.56 ± 0.09a,b 19.55 ± 0.06a-c 21.09 ± 0.23a,c,d 22.02 ± 0.22a-e 21.44 ± 0.18a-d,f 22.18 ± 0.26a-g 19.26 ± 0.12a-h 22.46 ± 0.16a-g 19.66 ± 0.19b-h 22.10 ± 0.17a-e,g,i,k
Water 19.11 ± 0.06 19.13 ± 0.10 19.62 ± 0.07a,b 19.87 ± 0.11a-c 18.49 ± 0.25a-d 20.82 ± 0.29a-e 16.22 ± 0.24a-f 19.46 ± 0.30a-g 16.67 ± 0.19a-h 18.64 ± 0.13a-e,g 16.93 ± 0.13b-f 19.08 ± 0.17c-g,i-k
Growth 0.220 ± 0.035 0.150 ± 0.0180a 0.111 ± 0.001a,b 0.071 ± 0.001a-c 0.146 ± 0.020a,c,d 0.113 ± 0.021a,b,d,e 0.147 ± 0.014a,c,d,f 0.099 ± 0.010a-g 0.120 ± 0.020a-e,g,h 0.074 ± 0.017a-i 0.113 ± 0.021a-e,h-j 0.070 ± 0.011a-i,k

F, female; M, male

Values represent means ± 1 SD (n = 30/group; that is, 30 males and 30 females in each lighting environment per strain)

a

P < 0.05 compared with value for C3H mice in male CWF control group.

b

P < 0.05 compared with value for C3H mice in female CWF control group.

c

P < 0.05 compared with value for C3H mice in male bLAD experimental group.

d

P < 0.05 compared with value for C3H mice in female bLAD experimental group.

e

P < 0.05 compared with value for C57BL/6 mice in male CWF control group.

f

P < 0.05 compared with value for C57BL/6 mice in female bLAD experimental group

g

P < 0.05 compared with value for BALB/c mice in male CWF control group.

h

P < 0.05 compared with value for BALB/c mice in male experimental control group.