Table 3.

Peak rupture potential indices predicted under each ILT modeling paradigm. The ILT configuration of each simulation is denoted by the ILT material model(s) listed.

	AAA-1	AAA-2	AAA-3	AAA-4	AAA-5	AAA-6	AAA-7
Paradigm 1 (high disparity)
(Sfavg , Wkavg)	0.22	0.26	0.32	0.29	0.23	0.39	0.48
Sfavg	0.22	0.26	0.30	0.29	0.23	0.34	0.48
Wkavg	0.26	0.28	0.36	0.36	0.28	0.51	0.53
Paradigm 2 (low disparity)
(Wk1, Wk2)	0.25	0.27	0.36	0.35	0.27	0.49	0.51
Wk1	0.25	0.27	0.35	0.35	0.27	0.47	0.52
Wk2	0.26	0.29	0.37	0.37	0.28	0.52	0.53
Paradigm 3 (low disparity)
(Sf1, Sf2)	0.24	0.25	0.29	0.28	0.22	0.32	0.48
Sf1	0.24	0.25	0.28	0.28	0.22	0.31	0.48
Sf2	0.24	0.26	0.31	0.30	0.24	0.36	0.48