Table 1. Social media data vs traditional data for identifying Hawaiian monk seals, their locations and human disturbance.
We show the number of seal reports obtained through traditional and Instagram-based reports, and results of z tests comparing the proportions of reports with seals/beaches identified and disturbances noted.
Instagram vs Traditional data 10/1/2014–9/30/2015 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Traditional | Percent | Percent | P value (Z test) | Z | df | P value | ||
Seal reports—total | 7655 | 2392 | ||||||
Individual seals identified | 205 | 68 | ||||||
Seal reports—seal identified | 6123 | 79.99% | 396 | 16.55% | 2.20E-16 | 56.73 | 2391 | <0.00001 |
Seals of Concern | 31 | 0.40% | 14 | 0.58% | 0.3284 | -1.16 | 2391 | 0.123 |
Seal reports—beach identified | 7485 | 97.78% | 1011 | 42.26% | 2.20E- 16 | 65.6 | 2391 | <0.00001 |
Human disturbance—total | 49 | 0.64% | 426 | 17.80% | 2.20E- 16 | -34.53 | 2391 | <0.00001 |
Human disturbance—minor* | 19 | 0.24% | 407 | 17.01% | 2.20E- 16 | -35.56 | 2391 | <0.00001 |
Human disturbance—major** | 24 | 0.31% | 19 | 0.79% | 0.003029 | -3.15 | 2391 | 0.00164 |
*Minor human disturbance includes the seal looking, mouthing or moving at least a body length.
**Major human disturbance involves the seal flushing to the water.