Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 23;14(10):e0222627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222627

Table 1. Social media data vs traditional data for identifying Hawaiian monk seals, their locations and human disturbance.

We show the number of seal reports obtained through traditional and Instagram-based reports, and results of z tests comparing the proportions of reports with seals/beaches identified and disturbances noted.

Instagram vs Traditional data 10/1/2014–9/30/2015
Traditional Percent Instagram Percent P value (Z test) Z df P value
Seal reports—total 7655 2392
Individual seals identified 205 68
Seal reports—seal identified 6123 79.99% 396 16.55% 2.20E-16 56.73 2391 <0.00001
Seals of Concern 31 0.40% 14 0.58% 0.3284 -1.16 2391 0.123
Seal reports—beach identified 7485 97.78% 1011 42.26% 2.20E- 16 65.6 2391 <0.00001
Human disturbance—total 49 0.64% 426 17.80% 2.20E- 16 -34.53 2391 <0.00001
Human disturbance—minor* 19 0.24% 407 17.01% 2.20E- 16 -35.56 2391 <0.00001
Human disturbance—major** 24 0.31% 19 0.79% 0.003029 -3.15 2391 0.00164

*Minor human disturbance includes the seal looking, mouthing or moving at least a body length.

**Major human disturbance involves the seal flushing to the water.