Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 23;14(10):e0218422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218422

Table 6. Costs, outcome and cost effectiveness.

Costs and outcomes Base case Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
HD:CAPD ratio 60:40 55:45 50:50 70:30
Undiscounted
Projected cost, RM 313,412 308,032 307,014 311,086
Total LYs 8.005 7.910 7.902 7.933
Total QALYs 7.113 7.037 7.041 7.025
Discounted (3%)
Projected cost, RM 94,425 93,517 93,236 94,361
LYs 2.417 2.407 2.407 2.410
QALYs 2.150 2.145 2.148 2.136
Cost effectiveness
Cost per LY (discounted) 39,074 38,844 38,740 39,156
Cost per QALY (discounted) 43,919 43,591 43,399 44,172
Cost per LY (undiscounted) 39,151 38,943 38,852 39,214
Cost per QALY (undiscounted) 44,059 43,774 43,606 44,281
ICER
Per LY (discounted) 120,160 355,207* - 355,207*
Per QALY (discounted) 734,979 -92,909* - -92,909*
Per LY (undiscounted) 62,090 132,108* - 132,108*
Per QALY (undiscounted) 87,864 -264,922* - -264,922*

ICER-incremental cost effectiveness ratio, QALY-quality-adjusted life year, LY-life Year

*”dominated” (worse outcomes, higher costs)