Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 13;62(9):3339–3358. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-19-0067

Table 4.

Linear mixed-effects Model 3 results quantifying the impact of vowel on the linear relationship between subglottal pressure (Ps) and accelerometer (ACC) signal magnitude.

Condition Estimate ± SE Estimate ± SE wrt /a/ df p r
Females
 Intercept
  /a/ −.70 ± .11
  /i/ .08 ± .03 1667.43 .001* .08
  /u/ .04 ± .03 1657.69 .012* .06
 Slope
  ACC × /a/ .61 ± .04
  ACC × /i/ −.04 ± .01 1667.17 .001* .08
  ACC × /u/ −.02 ± .01 1667.45 .001* .08
Males
 Intercept
  /a/ −.80 ± .17
  /i/ .41 ± .02 1112.80 < .001* .47
  /u/ .35 ± .02 946.40 < .001* .42
 Slope
  ACC × /a/ .66 ± .04
  ACC × /i/ −.15 ± .01 1113.20 < .001* .42
  ACC × /u/ −.13 ± .01 1112.37 < .001* .37

Note. For the vowel /a/ reference condition, the estimates of interceptand slope are shown. For the vowels /i/ and /u/, the estimates of intercepts and slopes are shown with reference to (wrt) those for vowel /a/. The standard error (SE), degrees of freedom (df), p value, and effect size (r) are reported for each estimate. A base 10 logarithmic transformation was computed for Ps and ACC values. The values in the /i/ and /u/ estimate columns are in reference to the associated /a/ estimate values. Em dashes indicate data not applicable.

*

p < .0125.