Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 27;62(7):2295–2316. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0048

Table 2.

Speech, language, and cognitive test performance: participant R. C.

Assessment Pre-Tx (Spn) Pre-Tx (Eng) Post-Tx (Spn) Post-Tx (Eng) 3.5 mo. f.u. (Spn) 3.5 mo. f.u. (Eng)
Mini Mental State Exam (30) 18 20 27 23
Stroop task (77)
 Stroop Color Naming (no. correct/77/1 min) 7 6 13 7
 Color Naming (uncorrected errors) 0 1 0 0
 Color Naming (self-corrected errors) 1 0 1 0
 Inhibition (no. correct/1 min) 4 0 10 6
 Inhibition (uncorrected errors) 2 3 1 2
 Inhibition (self-corrected errors) 1 0 1 1
Western Aphasia Battery–Aphasia Quotient (100) 67.2 71.7 75.7 72.9 72.3 69.4
 Spontaneous Speech (20) 13 13 13 14 13 13
 Information Content 7 7 9 8 8 8
 Fluency 6 6 5 5 5 5
 Auditory Verbal Comprehension (10) 8.5 7.75 8.55 7.75 8.15 7.00
 Repetition (10) 7.5 7.3 8.4 7.8 8.5 7.8
 Naming and Word Finding (10) 4.6 7.8 7.9 6.9 6.5 6.9
Boston Naming Test (60) 17 19 37 25 41 22
Pyramids and Palm Trees: Picture Version (shortened; 14) 14
Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale–Apraxia rating (0 = none, 4 = severe) 2 2
Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale–Dysarthria rating (0 = none, 4 = severe) 2 2
Northwestern Anagram Test (NAT; 12) 4 8
Bilingual Aphasia Test
 Syntactic Comprehension (87) 58 61 64 57
 Grammaticality Judgments (10) 7 6 10 9

Note. Em dash indicates that data were not collected at the specified time point. A short version of the NAT sampling all of the grammatical structures on the assessment was used. Tx = treatment; Spn = Spanish; Eng = English; mo. = month; f.u. = follow-up.