Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Cogn. 2019 Aug 9;136:103593. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103593

Table 2.

Repeated Measures ANOVA: Within (Type, Region, Valence), Between (Depressed)

Source df ε F ηp2 p
Type 1, 37 0.27 .007 .60
Region 1.45, 53.8 0.73 8.10 .18 .002**
Valence 1, 37 0.21 .006 .65
Depressed 1, 37 2.55 .06 .12
Type * Region 1.18, 43.6 0.59 9.04 .20 .003**
Type * Valence 1, 37 6.22 .14 .02*
Type * Depressed 1, 37 0.60 .02 .44
Region * Valence 1.31, 48.6 0.66 0.34 .009 .62
Region * Depressed 1.45, 53.8 0.73 0.88 .02 .39
Valence * Depressed 1, 37 1.07 .03 .31
Type * Region * Valence 1.24, 46.0 0.62 0.05 .001 .87
Type * Region * Depressed 1.18, 43.6 0.59 0.01 <.001 .94
Type * Valence * Depressed 1, 37 0.81 .02 .37
Region * Valence * Depressed 1.31, 48.6 0.66 0.07 .002 .86
Type * Region * Valence * Depressed 1.24, 46.0 0.62 0.45 .01 .55

Note. Mauchly’s Test of Sphericity indicated a departure from sphericity for the Region factor. Degrees of freedom and p values have been adjusted using the Greenhouse-Geisser correction.

*

Significant at the p < .05 level.

**

Significant at the p < .01 level.