. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 23.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Biol. 2018 Dec 12;221(Pt 24):jeb188391. doi: 10.1242/jeb.188391

Table 1. SMA and OLS regression coefficients of body mass against claw tip diameter for Gromphadorhina portentosa, Nauphoeta cinerea, Carausius morosus and Atta cephalotes.

Species	Model	Elevation/intercept [log₁₀(μm)] [95% CI⁻, 95% CI⁺]	Slope [95% CI⁻, 95% CI⁺]	R²
G. portentosa	SMA	−0.813 [−1.201, −0.425]	0.542 [0.433, 0.679]	0.80
	OLS	−0.643 [−1.030, −0.255]	0.486 [0.363, 0.609]
N. cinerea	SMA	−0.983 [−1.393, −0.573]	0.547 [0.383, 0.782]	0.46
	OLS	−0.632 [−1.040, −0.225]	0.371 [0.171, 0.570]
C. morosus	SMA	−0.849 [−1.263, −0.436]	0.609 [0.440, 0.843]	0.55
	OLS	−0.550 [−0.960, −0.140]	0.454 [0.252, 0.655]
A. cephalotes	SMA	0.152 [0.046, 0.257]	0.233 [0.165, 0.328]	0.41
	OLS	0.231 [0.130, 0.332]	0.148 [0.067, 0.229]

SMA, standardised major axis; OLS, ordinary least squares.