Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;63(11):e01260-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01260-19

TABLE 2.

Final piperacillin model and bootstrap analysisa

Parameter Final model
Bootstrap analysis (n = 1,000)
Point estimate RSE (%) 95% CI Shrinkage (%) 2.5th percentile Median 97.5th percentile
Typical value
    CL (liters/h) 3.92 17.4 2.58 to 5.26 2.74 3.72 5.35
    Vc (liters) 4.87 27.2 2.28 to 7.46 2.47 4.35 8.24
    Q (liters/h) 0.25 86.2 −0.17 to 0.68 0.05 0.21 1.24
    Vp (liters) 0.49 47.9 0.03 to 0.95 0.19 0.66 8.46
Covariate effect
    WT on CL and Q (exponent) 1.40 13.2 1.03 to 1.76 0.95 1.36 1.78
    Furosemide on CL −0.28 97.7 −0.83 to 0.26 −0.64 −0.29 −0.06
    WT on Vc and Vp (exponent) 1.26 23.4 0.68 to 1.84 0.32 1.16 1.95
Variance model
    IIV (CL) 0.44 17.6 0.29 to 0.59 4.8 0.27 0.42 0.57
    IIV (Vc)
    IIV (Q)
    IIV (Vp)
Proportional error 0.46 10.5 0.37 to 0.56 15 0.36 0.45 0.53
a

CI, confidence interval; CL, clearance; IIV, interindividual variability; Q, intercompartmental clearance; RSE, residual standard error; Vc, volume of distribution of the central compartment; Vp, volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment; WT, body weight.