Table 2.
Compounds | RI | Relative contenta,b (%) | Aroma performance | Odor description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nonanal | ND | No contribution | Orange-like (Kumazawa and Masuda, 2002) | |
Isopentyl hexanoate | ND | No contribution | Fruity (Rodríguez et al., 2015) | |
β-Bisabolene | ND | No contribution | Orange (Macleod and Pieris, 1984) | |
Benzyl alcohol | ND | No contribution | Fruity (Ito et al., 2002) | |
2-Phenylethyl alcohol | ND | No contribution | Rose (Qin et al., 2013) | |
(E)-β-Ocimene | 1257 | 0.98 ± 0.14 | Stable and persistent | Herbal (Zeng et al., 2017a) |
Linalool | 1562 | 1.62 ± 0.02 | Stable and persistent | Floral (Katsuno et al., 2014; Qin et al., 2013) |
(E)-β-Farnesene | 1673 | 3.48 ± 0.02 | Stable and persistent | Citric, sweet, wood (Rodríguez et al., 2015) |
Naphthalene | 1735 | 4.13 ± 0.62 | Stable and persistent | Naphthalene (Yang et al., 2008) |
α-Farnesene | 1754 | 1.70 ± 0.06 | Stable and persistent | Fruity, herbal (Zeng et al., 2017a) |
Methyl salicylate | 1769 | 0.54 ± 0.14 | Stable and persistent | Sweet (Qin et al., 2013) |
(Z)-Jasmone | 1912 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | Stable and persistent | Floral, green (Katsuno et al., 2014; Qin et al., 2013) |
Nerolidol | 23.59 ± 5.74 | Stable and persistent | Floral, fruity (Qin et al., 2013) | |
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one | 1348 | 2.21 ± 0.36 | Less persistent | Sweet, fruity (Qin et al., 2013) |
Benzaldehyde | 1531 | 3.87 ± 0.77 | Less persistent | Fragrant, sweet (Qin et al., 2013) |
Benzeneacetaldehyde | 1648 | 4.93 ± 0.58 | Less persistent | Sweet, almond (Qin et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2017) |
Benzyl nitrile | 1916 | 3.87 ± 0.18 | Less persistent | Stale, hay (Macleod and Panchasara, 1983) |
Phenethyl isobutyrate | 1.11 ± 0.30 | Less persistent | Fruity, Rose (Rodríguez et al., 2015) | |
Indole | 17.63 ± 1.38 | Less persistent | Floral, amimalic (Katsuno et al., 2014; Qin et al., 2013) |
RI retention indices
aData of tea liquid (without leaves) analyzed at the tea/water ratio of 1:50 (g/mL)
bND: not detected in the infusion headspace