Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 17;10:2394. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02394

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Graphical representation showing the fold change analysis of different gene subgroups [“classical antiviral IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs),” “weakly IFN-λ3-induced genes,” and “strongly IFN-λ3-induced genes”]. (A) The classical antiviral IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) subgroup. “Classical ISGs” were defined by their designation in the literature. (B) The weakly IFN-λ3-induced gene subgroup. “Weakly IFN-λ3-induced genes:” fold increase by IFN-λ3 over mock control/fold increase by IFN-α over mock control >2 and fold increase by IFN-α over mock control >4. Unknown genes were named as UN1, UN2, and UN3. (C) The strongly IFN-λ3-induced gene subgroup. “Strongly IFN-λ3-induced genes:” fold increase by IFN-λ3 over mock control/fold increase by IFN-α over mock control >4 and fold increase by IFN-α over mock control <2.