Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 23;9:15225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51679-8

Table 8.

Proteasomal cleavage and TAP transport efficiency scores of MHC-I predicted epitopes.

Protein Name Position Epitope Sequence Proteasomal C terminal cleavage Score* TAP transport efficiency Score** Epitope identification Score***
L1 12–21 (Type 16) YLPPVPVSKV 1.0473 0.9771 1.3162
12–21 (Type 18) YLPPPSVARV 0.9753 0.8581 0.9656
114–125 (Type 16) GVGISGHPLLNK 0.8023 0.6695 0.7094
104–115 (Type 18) GVEIGRGQPLGV 0.5253 0.9200 0.7017
114–125 (Type 18) GVGLSGHPFYNK 0.3726 0.9360 0.6484
411–421 (Type 16) GGTLEDTYRFV 0.5795 0.9599 0.8396
414–425 (Type 18) PTTSLVDTYRFV 0.5992 0.9267 0.7579
460–470 (Type 16) DQFPLGRKFLL 0.9879 0.9810 1.2046
461–471 (Type 18) DQYPLGRKFLV 0.9358 0.9606 1.0779
L2 11–20 (Type 16) KRASATQLYK 1.3081 0.9773 1.6173
11–20 (Type 18) KRASVTDLYK 1.1145 0.9726 1.4230
60–71 (Type 18) GTGSGTGGRTGY 0.4471 0.4000 0.5630
280–291 (Type 16) DPDFLDIVALHR 0.8251 0.9405 1.0209
293–303 (Type 16) ALTSRRTGIRY 0.6667 0.9280 0.8580
273–284 (Type 18) DSDFMDIIRLHR 0.6514 0.9917 0.8881
286–296 (Type 18) ALTSRRGTVRF 0.6545 0.8565 0.7305

*Higher rates show better quality of proteasomal cleavage, **Higher rates show better quality of tap transport efficiency, *** Higher rates show better quality of epitope identification.