Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 5;4:261–270. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.09.002

Table 1.

Physical and mechanical properties of common used metallic implants compared with bone tissue.

Material Young's Modulus, E (GPa) Yield Strength σy (MPa) Tensile Strength σUTS (MPa) Density (g/cm3) Thermal Expansion coefficient (10−6/°C) Ref.
Cortical Bone 15–30 30–70 70–150 1.75 27.5 [15,16]
Stainless Steel 316L 200 221–1213 586–1351 8.03 19.5 [17]
Pure Titanium (Ti) -Grade 1 110 485 760 4.51 8.5 [19]
Ti–6Al–4V 101–120 795–1034 860–1103 4.43 8.7 [19]
Cobalt–Chromium 210–253 448–1606 655–1869 8.3 15.1 [18]
Pure Magnesium 45 20 90–190 1.74 26 [15,20]
AZ31 45 171–303 241–365 1.78 26 [21]
Pure Iron 211 150 210 7.87 12 [22]
Fe–30Mn 201 239 518 7.64 8.8 [[22], [23], [24]]
Pure Zinc 90–100 10–85 20–170 7.14 30–35 [25]
Zn–1Mg 180 340 [26]
Zn-0.7Li 476 568 [27]