Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Dec 10;73(3):344–353. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.09.012

Table 4.

Cox proportional hazard model for the composite incident CVD–death outcome using the CIS, adjusted for ln(PCEP), ln(UACR), and eGFR.

Parameter aHR (95% CI) per 1-unit increase p aHR per 1-SD increase
ln(PCEP) 2.81 (2.32-3.39) <0.001 1.62 (1.48-1.77)
ln(UACR) 1.10 (1.05-1.15) <0.001 1.22 (1.10-1.35)
eGFR 0.99 (0.98-1.00) 0.02 0.88 (0.79-0.98)
CIS 1.05 (1.04-1.07) <0.001 1.47 (1.32-1.65)

Size of HR cannot be used to indicate relative strength of these predictors, since their variances are not equal. However, the standardized HRs can be compared.

CIS= Composite inflammation score, eGFR= Estimated glomerular filtration rate, ln(PECP)= natural logarithm of Pooled Cohort Equation probability, ln(UACR)= natural logarithm of albumin-creatinine ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CVD, cardiovascular disease; SD, standard deviation