Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 22;38:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.08.005

Table 4.

Propensity score weighted, adjusted HRs for periodontitis and total cancer incidence, total cancer death, colorectal cancer incidence and lung cancer incidence, by lifecourse SES

High SES Low SES

All Cancer Incidence Cases Person-years HR* 95% CI p All Cancer Incidence Cases Person-years HR* 95% CI p

Periodontitis (CDC-AAP) Periodontitis (CDC-AAP)
 No/mild 335 25847 1  No/mild 114 6744 1
 Moderate 410 24552 1.08 0.93 1.25 0.34  Moderate 150 7939 0.91 0.70 1.19 0.49
 Severe 196 9384 1.18 0.98 1.42 0.08  Severe 96 4682 0.89 0.65 1.20 0.44
Ptrend 0.08 Ptrend
Edentulism 120 5860 1.21 0.96 1.52 0.10 Edentulism 227 10588 1.06 0.82 1.37 0.65

Periodontitis (ARIC) Periodontitis (ARIC)
 No/mild 362 28462 1.00  No/mild 89 5975 1.00
 Moderate 347 21131 1.13 0.97 1.32 0.12  Moderate 120 6261 1.28 0.92 1.77 0.14
 Severe 232 10190 1.25 1.04 1.50 0.02  Severe 151 7129 1.12 0.84 1.51 0.44
Ptrend 0.02 Ptrend 0.51
Edentulism 120 5860 1.22 0.98 1.53 0.08 Edentulism 227 10588 1.29 0.98 1.71 0.07

All Cancer Death Cases Person-years HR* 95% CI p All Cancer Death Cases Person-years HR* 95% CI p

Periodontitis (CDC-AAP) Periodontitis (CDC-AAP)
 No/mild 77 27909 1.00  No/mild 40 7442 1
 Moderate 123 26915 1.22 0.91 1.64 0.19  Moderate 57 8651 0.95 0.61 1.48 0.81
 Severe 63 10333 1.38 0.98 1.96 0.07  Severe 38 5143 0.98 0.61 1.58 0.94
Ptrend 0.06 Ptrend 0.92
Edentulism 51 6343 1.57 1.05 2.33 0.03 Edentulism 98 11652 1.35 0.90 2.02 0.15

Periodontitis (ARIC) Periodontitis (ARIC)
 No/mild 86 30692 1.00  No/mild 31 6502 1.00
 Moderate 94 23188 1.17 0.86 1.58 0.32  Moderate 44 6910 1.13 0.66 1.94 0.65
 Severe 83 11276 1.40 1.01 1.94 0.04  Severe 60 7823 1.24 0.77 2.01 0.37
Ptrend 0.04 Ptrend 0.37
Edentulism 51 6343 1.57 1.07 2.31 0.02 Edentulism 98 11652 1.59 1.01 2.50 0.04

Colorectal Cancer Incidence Cases Person-years HR* 95% CI p Colorectal Cancer Incidence Cases Person-years HR* 95% CI p

Periodontitis (CDC-AAP) Periodontitis (CDC-AAP)
 No/mild 27 25847 1  No/mild 10 6744 1.00
 Moderate 33 24552 1.19 0.69 2.03 0.54  Moderate 13 7939 1.23 0.51 2.92 0.65
 Severe 21 9384 1.64 0.90 2.99 0.11  Severe 12 4682 2.21 0.87 5.61 0.09
Ptrend 0.12 Ptrend 0.11
Edentulism 12 5860 1.52 0.75 3.05 0.24 Edentulism 34 10588 2.41 1.06 5.49 0.04

Periodontitis (ARIC) Periodontitis (ARIC)
 No/mild 32 28462 1  No/mild 10 5975 1.00
 Moderate 27 21131 1.18 0.67 2.06 0.57  Moderate 6 6261 0.80 0.25 2.57 0.70
 Severe 22 10190 1.22 0.67 2.23 0.52  Severe 19 7129 1.60 0.65 3.95 0.30
Ptrend 0.48 Ptrend 0.30
Edentulism 12 5860 1.39 0.70 2.76 0.35 Edentulism 34 10588 2.27 0.95 5.45 0.07

Lung Cancer Incidence Cases Person-years HR* 95% CI p Lung Cancer Incidence Cases Person-years HR* 95% CI p

Periodontitis (CDC-AAP) Periodontitis (CDC-AAP)
 No/mild 31 25847 1 No/mild 6 6744 1.00
 Moderate 38 24552 0.82 0.49 1.35 0.43  Moderate 24 7939 1.99 0.80 4.97 0.14
 Severe 38 9384 1.72 1.03 2.88 0.04  Severe 15 4682 1.91 0.74 4.96 0.18
Ptrend 0.05 Ptrend 0.18
Edentulism 31 5860 1.71 0.92 3.19 0.09 Edentulism 43 10588 2.77 1.15 6.68 0.02

Periodontitis (ARIC) Periodontitis (ARIC)
 No/mild 28 28462 1  No/mild 6 5975 1.00
 Moderate 37 21131 1.21 0.71 2.06 0.48  Moderate 11 6261 1.15 0.37 3.57 0.81
 Severe 42 10190 1.66 0.97 2.85 0.07  Severe 28 7129 2.40 0.97 5.96 0.06
Ptrend 0.07 Ptrend 0.04
Edentulism 31 5860 1.99 1.05 3.79 0.04 Edentulism 43 10588 3.00 1.22 7.37 0.02
*

All Cox models are adjusted for age, field center by race, education level, smoking status, smoking duration, drinking status, body mass index, diabetes status (diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, at risk for diabetes [reference is normal]), joint terms for sex and HRT use (female nonuser, female user [reference is men]), and edentulism status. The propensity score was generated based on neighborhood income, health insurance status, frequency of routine physical examination, having a dentist, frequency of routine dental visit, last time of dental visit separately for participants with low and high lifecourse SES. The inverse of the propensity score was used as a weight in the Cox model. Confidence interval was generated based on robust sandwich variance.