Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 2;4(3):123–128. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000226

Table 1.

The frequency distribution and comparison of the etiological subtypes of the CISS, SPARKLE and TOAST systems

Subtype TOAST SPARKLE CISS CISS versus CISS versus TOAST versus
SPARKLE TOAST SPARKLE
n (%) n (%) n (%) P value P value P value
LAA 139 (46.5) 165 (55.2) 199 (66.6) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
CE 35 (11.7) 32 (10.7) 36 (12.0) 0.289 1 0.581
SVD 31 (10.4) 29 (9.7) 19 (6.4) 0.021 0.02 0.824
OE 16 (5.4) 17 (5.7) 17 (5.7) 1 1 1
UE 78 (26.1) 56 (18.7) 28 (9.4) <0.001 <0.001 0.007
Total 299 299 299

CE, cardioembolism; CISS, Chinese Ischemic Stroke Subclassification; LAA, large artery atherosclerosis; OE, other etiology; SPARKLE, Subtypes of Ischemic Stroke Classification System; SVD, small-vessel disease; TOAST, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; UE, undetermined etiology.