Table 2.
MRI | Site | Baseline | 2 d | 7 d | 14 d | 21 d | 28 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (range, n) | Mean (range, n) | Mean (range, n) | Mean (range, n) | Mean (range, n) | Mean (range, n) | ||
Sham | 1 | 28 (28 – 26, n = 13)¤¤¤ | 27 (28 – 25, n = 13)¤¤¤ | 27 (28 – 25, n = 13) ¤¤¤ | 28 (28 – 25, n = 13) ¤¤¤ | 27 (28 – 26, n = 13) ¤¤¤ | 27 (28 – 26, n = 13) ¤¤¤ |
2 | 28 (28 – 28, n = 9) | 28 (28 – 27, n = 10) | 28 (28 – 22, n = 9) | 28 (28 – 24, n = 8) | 28 (28 – 20, n = 10) | 27 (28 – 24, n = 8) | |
3 | 26 (28 – 24, n = 9)*+ | 25 (28 – 21, n = 9) | 23 (27 – 21, n = 9)** | 25 (27 – 22, n = 9)** | 25 (26 – 24, n = 9)* | 24 (26 – 24, n = 8)** | |
TBI | 1 | 28 (28 – 28, n = 45) ¤¤¤ | 11 (21 – 1,11= 45)¤¤¤ | 16 (24 – 8, n = 45) ¤¤¤ | 17 (24 – 10, n = 45) ¤¤¤ | 18 (26 – 12, n = 45) ¤¤¤ | 20 (28 – 11, n = 45) ¤¤¤ |
2 | 28 (28 – 28, n = 18)*** | 17 (22 – 6, n = 20)*** | 21 (27 – 17, n = 19)*** | 20 (27 – 16, n = 13)*** | 25 (28 – 17, n = 20)*** | 25 (28 – 20, n = 15)*** | |
3 | 27 (28 – 24, n = 14) | 13 (17 – 10, n = 14)+ | 21 (25 – 17, n = 14)*** | 25 (26 – 22, n = 14)*** | 24 (26 – 22, n = 14)*** | 25 (27 – 23, n = 11)*** | |
EEG | |||||||
Sham | 2 | 28 (28 – 28, n = 3) | 23 (23 – 20, n = 3) | 27 (28 – 26, n = 3) | 26 (27 – 25, n = 3) | 27 (27 – 27, n = 2) | 26 (28 – 26, n = 3) |
3 | 26 (26 – 25, n = 7) | 24 (26 – 22, n = 7) | 24 (26 – 23, n = 7)+ | 24 (26 – 20, n = 7) | 23 (25 – 21, n = 7)++ | 23 (24 – 22, n = 7)+++ | |
TBI | 2 | 28 (28 – 28, n = 10) | 12 (16 – 7, n = 8) | 17 (20 – 13, n = 8) | 17 (22 – 15, n = 8) | 19 (24 – 16, n = 6) | 22 (26 – 21, n = 7) |
3 | 27 (28 – 25, n = 13) | 11 (15 – 9, n = 13) | 19 (21 – 17, n = 13) | 24 (28 – 22, n = 9)+ | 25 (27 – 22, n = 9)+ | 23 (26 – 21, n = 9) |
Site 1, University of Eastern Finland (UEF); Site 2, University of Monash (Melbourne); Site 3, University California (UCLA). Abbreviation: d, day; EEG, electroencephalography; n, number of animals; TBI, traumatic brain injury. Statistical significances:
p < 0.001, comparison between all sites (Kruskal-Wallis test);
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001 comparison with UEF (Dunn’s multiple comparison and Mann-Whitney U test);
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001, comparison between Melbourne (Dunn’s multiple comparison and Mann-Whitney U test).