Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Epilepsy Res. 2019 Jan 18;151:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.01.006

Table 2.

Neuroscore of rats in the MRI and EEG groups at the different sites.

MRI Site Baseline 2 d 7 d 14 d 21 d 28 d
Mean (range, n) Mean (range, n) Mean (range, n) Mean (range, n) Mean (range, n) Mean (range, n)
Sham 1 28 (28 – 26, n = 13)¤¤¤ 27 (28 – 25, n = 13)¤¤¤ 27 (28 – 25, n = 13) ¤¤¤ 28 (28 – 25, n = 13) ¤¤¤ 27 (28 – 26, n = 13) ¤¤¤ 27 (28 – 26, n = 13) ¤¤¤
2 28 (28 – 28, n = 9) 28 (28 – 27, n = 10) 28 (28 – 22, n = 9) 28 (28 – 24, n = 8) 28 (28 – 20, n = 10) 27 (28 – 24, n = 8)
3 26 (28 – 24, n = 9)*+ 25 (28 – 21, n = 9) 23 (27 – 21, n = 9)** 25 (27 – 22, n = 9)** 25 (26 – 24, n = 9)* 24 (26 – 24, n = 8)**
TBI 1 28 (28 – 28, n = 45) ¤¤¤ 11 (21 – 1,11= 45)¤¤¤ 16 (24 – 8, n = 45) ¤¤¤ 17 (24 – 10, n = 45) ¤¤¤ 18 (26 – 12, n = 45) ¤¤¤ 20 (28 – 11, n = 45) ¤¤¤
2 28 (28 – 28, n = 18)*** 17 (22 – 6, n = 20)*** 21 (27 – 17, n = 19)*** 20 (27 – 16, n = 13)*** 25 (28 – 17, n = 20)*** 25 (28 – 20, n = 15)***
3 27 (28 – 24, n = 14) 13 (17 – 10, n = 14)+ 21 (25 – 17, n = 14)*** 25 (26 – 22, n = 14)*** 24 (26 – 22, n = 14)*** 25 (27 – 23, n = 11)***
EEG
Sham 2 28 (28 – 28, n = 3) 23 (23 – 20, n = 3) 27 (28 – 26, n = 3) 26 (27 – 25, n = 3) 27 (27 – 27, n = 2) 26 (28 – 26, n = 3)
3 26 (26 – 25, n = 7) 24 (26 – 22, n = 7) 24 (26 – 23, n = 7)+ 24 (26 – 20, n = 7) 23 (25 – 21, n = 7)++ 23 (24 – 22, n = 7)+++
TBI 2 28 (28 – 28, n = 10) 12 (16 – 7, n = 8) 17 (20 – 13, n = 8) 17 (22 – 15, n = 8) 19 (24 – 16, n = 6) 22 (26 – 21, n = 7)
3 27 (28 – 25, n = 13) 11 (15 – 9, n = 13) 19 (21 – 17, n = 13) 24 (28 – 22, n = 9)+ 25 (27 – 22, n = 9)+ 23 (26 – 21, n = 9)

Site 1, University of Eastern Finland (UEF); Site 2, University of Monash (Melbourne); Site 3, University California (UCLA). Abbreviation: d, day; EEG, electroencephalography; n, number of animals; TBI, traumatic brain injury. Statistical significances:

¤¤¤

p < 0.001, comparison between all sites (Kruskal-Wallis test);

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001 comparison with UEF (Dunn’s multiple comparison and Mann-Whitney U test);

+

p < 0.05,

++

p < 0.01,

+++

p < 0.001, comparison between Melbourne (Dunn’s multiple comparison and Mann-Whitney U test).