Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0224121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224121

Table 3. Comparison of hemodynamic and anatomical values between 2D and 4D Flow MRI in the entire study collective.

4D Flow MRI 95% CI 2D Flow MRI 95% CI P value
SV [ml] 88.6 ± 21.3 [82.4; 94.7] 82.8 ± 18.9 [77.3; 88.3] < 0.01*
Qmax [ml/s] 359.6 ± 92.2 [332.8; 386.6] 369.7 ± 82.3 [341.9; 391.0] 0.1
t_Qmax [ms] 136 ± 23.9 [131.7; 150.5] 136 ± 23.9 [122.0; 138.7] < 0.05*
vmax [cm/s] 91.1 ± 19.5 [96.8; 85.5] 87.4 ± 17.2 [82.5; 92.4] 0.2
t_vmax [ms] 147.5 ± 56.9 [131.1; 164.0] 142.18 ± 50.5 [125.5; 149.3] 0.3
Amax [mm2] 865.0 ± 237.4 [797.2; 934.5] 789.2 ± 233.5 [721.7; 856.7] 0.1
Amin [mm2] 626.5 ± 209.5 [566.0; 687.1] 565.6 ± 228.8 [499.5; 631.7] 0.2
Strain [%] 41.3 ± 18.5 [36.0; 46.6] 46.1 ± 20.9 [40.1; 52.2] 0.2

Values are given as average ± standard deviation; asterisk (*) indicates significance.