Table 4.

Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy values for each study

Reference	Type of study	Subjects	Imaging	True positive	True negative	False positive	False negative	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	Diagnostic accuracy (%)
Handschel et al. [15]	Retrospect.	107	CT	38	53	8	8	82.6	86.9	85.0
Gu et al. [14]	Retrospect.	46	CT	5	34	0	7	41.7	100	84.8
			MRI	7	33	1	5	58.3	97.1	87.0
			PET/CT	7	33	1	5	58.3	97.1	87.0
			CT+MRI	8	34	0	4	66.7	100	91.3
			CT+PET/CT	8	34	0	4	66.7	100	91.3
			MR+PET/CT	9	34	0	3	75.0	100	93.5
			CT+MRI+PET/CT	10	34	0	2	83.3	100	95.7
Hendrikx et al. [8]	Retrospect.	23	CBCT	10	12	0	1	90.9	100	95.7
			Digital PR	6	11	1	5	54.5	91.7	73.9
			MRI	9	8	4	2	83.3	100	75.8
Van Cann et al. [9]	Prospect.	66	CT	25	22	1	18	58.1	95.7	71.2
			MRI	27	23	0	16	62.8	100	75.8
			PR	N.I.	N.I.	N.I.	N.I.	-	-	-
			SPE CT	N.I.	N.I.	N.I.	N.I.	-	-	-
Van den Brekel et al. [13]	Retrospect.	29	MRI	17	8	3	1	94.8	73.0	85.7
		23	CT	9	8	1	5	64.0	89.0	73.9
		26	PR	N.I.	N.I.	N.I.	N.I.	-	-	-
Hakim et al. [12]	Prospect.	78	MSCT	21	37	7	13	63	81	75
		62	SPECT	29	16	16	1	96	48	73
		58	CBCT	29	16	11	2	93	62	78
Kolk et al. [16]	Prospect.	30	SPECT/CT	19	11	0	0	100	100	100
	Retrospect.	20	MRI	17	11	1	1	95	94	93
			MSCT	15	11	0	4	89	100	86
			PR	14	9	3	4	74	82	77
			SPECT	11	9	0	0	100	100	100
			MSCT	10	9	0	1	89	100	95
			MRI	10	8	1	1	95	94	90
			PR	7	9	2	2	74	82	80

CT: computed tomography; CBCT: cone beam computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MSCT: multi-slice computed tomography; N.I.: none information; PR: panoramic radiography; PET: positron emission tomography; SPECT: single-photon emission tomography